<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://vista.powerblogs.com/">
<title>Vista News &amp; Ramblings</title>
<link>http://vista.powerblogs.com/</link>
<description>News, Ramblings and chit-chat.</description>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:date>2008-05-09T10:05+00:00</dc:date>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://vista.powerblogs.com/posts/1210330290.shtml" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://vista.powerblogs.com/posts/1210199715.shtml" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://vista.powerblogs.com/posts/1210103037.shtml" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://vista.powerblogs.com/posts/1209706402.shtml" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://vista.powerblogs.com/posts/1209514766.shtml" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://vista.powerblogs.com/posts/1209464273.shtml" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://vista.powerblogs.com/posts/1209084398.shtml" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://vista.powerblogs.com/posts/1208527840.shtml" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://vista.powerblogs.com/posts/1208294220.shtml" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://vista.powerblogs.com/posts/1207642069.shtml" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://vista.powerblogs.com/posts/1210330290.shtml">
<title>Lebanese Army  and Hezbollah Negotiates Surrender</title>
<link>http://vista.powerblogs.com/posts/1210330290.shtml</link>
<description>Post Source: CNN News...</description>
<dc:creator>Sandi</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-09T10:05+00:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="right">Post Source: <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/05/09/beirut.violence/index.html">CNN News</a></div><br />
...of Western Beirut Government Positions.<br />
<br />
I'm surprised this isn't getting more play in the media. I suppose because main stream media is all too wraped up and giddy about the Democratic two horse primary race. A less than exciting race with one horse lame and falling back as they near the finish line.<br />
<br />
<div class="bquote">BEIRUT, Lebanon (CNN) -- Western Beirut fell under the control of opposition Hezbollah militias Friday in what amounted to an army-negotiated surrender of pro-government positions, Lebanese Internal Security Forces and Western military observers said.<br />
<br />
 The "dramatic development" is a major blow to the democratically elected and pro-Western government of Lebanon, CNN's Brent Sadler said.<br />
<br />
Soldiers went to several offices of pro-government political parties in western Beirut overnight, he said. They persuaded pro-government gunmen who had battled Hezbollah militants to leave the offices as the opposition forces hovered nearby, he said.<br />
<br />
Druze leader Walid Jumblatt, part of the pro-government coalition, said the government was "now at the end of a gun barrel" and they expect the "conditions for surrender will be offered sooner or later," Sadler reported.<br />
<br />
"I think ... it's a coup," Jumblatt told CNN in a phone interview. "The Lebanese army is in total paralysis."<br />
<br />
Rather than fight, the army has stayed above the fray. With its own political factions, taking sides could throw the military into disarray.<br />
<br />
With pro-government gunmen out of the way, the fighting in the capital eased at bit Friday after intense gun battles the previous two days echoed through Beirut's streets.</div><br />
<a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/05/09/beirut.violence/index.html">Read the rest at CNN</a>.<BR /><BR />]]></content:encoded>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://vista.powerblogs.com/posts/1210199715.shtml">
<title>Advocate For Unfairness...</title>
<link>http://vista.powerblogs.com/posts/1210199715.shtml</link>
<description>&amp;nbsp;...</description>
<dc:creator>Sandi</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-07T22:05+00:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[&nbsp;<br />
...and other <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-op-orourke4-2008may04,0,1391489,print.story">commencement advice for graduates by P.J. O'Rourke</a> in the LA Times Opinion column.<br />
<br />
Here are some excerpts, but you'll want to read the whole thing. It's really quite good advice for everyone, not just young graduates.<br />
<br />
<div class="bquote">1. Go out and make a bunch of money!<br />
<br />
Here we are living in the world's most prosperous country, surrounded by all the comforts, conveniences and security that money can provide. Yet no American political, intellectual or cultural leader ever says to young people, "Go out and make a bunch of money." Instead, they tell you that money can't buy happiness. Maybe, but money can rent it.<br />
<br />
There's nothing the matter with honest moneymaking. Wealth is not a pizza, where if I have too many slices you have to eat the Domino's box. In a free society, with the rule of law and property rights, no one loses when someone else gets rich.</div><br />
Well as I always say: Money can't buy happiness, it sure can help you look in a lot more places. It is my belief that income disparity is created by two things. Our progressive tax system and welfare. As long as you take enough from the wealthy to keep the lowest class comfortable they are happy to stay in that state. Remove that incentive (except for the very needy that cannot work or are mentally challenged) and people will provide for themselves.<br />
<br />
<div class="bquote">2. Don't be an idealist!<br />
<br />
Don't chain yourself to a redwood tree. Instead, be a corporate lawyer and make $500,000 a year. No matter how much you cheat the IRS, you'll still end up paying $100,000 in property, sales and excise taxes. That's $100,000 to schools, sewers, roads, firefighters and police. You'll be doing good for society. Does chaining yourself to a redwood tree do society $100,000 worth of good?<br />
<br />
Idealists are also bullies. The idealist says, "I care more about the redwood trees than you do. I care so much I can't eat. I can't sleep. It broke up my marriage. And because I care more than you do, I'm a better person. And because I'm the better person, I have the right to boss you around."<br />
<br />
Get a pair of bolt cutters and liberate that tree.<br />
<br />
Who does more for the redwoods and society anyway -- the guy chained to a tree or the guy who founds the "Green Travel Redwood Tree-Hug Tour Company" and makes a million by turning redwoods into a tourist destination, a valuable resource that people will pay just to go look at?<br />
<br />
So make your contribution by getting rich. Don't be an idealist.</div><br />
I'll have to agree and disagree someone on this one. Making money takes a certain amount of idealism. However his point is well taken that too much idealism misdirected is counter-productive.<br />
<br />
<div class="bquote">3. Get politically uninvolved!<br />
<br />
All politics stink. Even democracy stinks. Imagine if our clothes were selected by the majority of shoppers, which would be teenage girls. I'd be standing here with my bellybutton exposed. Imagine deciding the dinner menu by family secret ballot. I've got three kids and three dogs in my family. We'd be eating Froot Loops and rotten meat.<br />
<br />
But let me make a distinction between politics and politicians. Some people are under the misapprehension that all politicians stink. Impeach George W. Bush, and everything will be fine. Nab Ted Kennedy on a DUI, and the nation's problems will be solved.<br />
<br />
But the problem isn't politicians -- it's politics. Politics won't allow for the truth. And we can't blame the politicians for that. Imagine what even a little truth would sound like on today's campaign trail:<br />
<br />
"No, I can't fix public education. The problem isn't the teachers unions or a lack of funding for salaries, vouchers or more computer equipment The problem is your kids!"</div><br />
Truth in politics, what a novel idea. But honesty will never fly. Besides the people know politicians lie and want them to do so, and will defend the lies to the bitter end. Visiting any forum that discusses political news will easily convince you of that.<br />
<br />
<div class="bquote">4. Forget about fairness!<br />
<br />
We all get confused about the contradictory messages that life and politics send.<br />
<br />
Life sends the message, "I'd better not be poor. I'd better get rich. I'd better make more money than other people." Meanwhile, politics sends us the message, "Some people make more money than others. Some are rich while others are poor. We'd better close that 'income disparity gap.' It's not fair!"<br />
<br />
Well, I am here to advocate for unfairness. I've got a 10-year-old at home. She's always saying, "That's not fair." When she says this, I say, "Honey, you're cute. That's not fair. Your family is pretty well off. That's not fair. You were born in America. That's not fair. Darling, you had better pray to God that things don't start getting fair for you." What we need is more income, even if it means a bigger income disparity gap.</div><br />
Which makes number 1 about making money all important. We either stay at the bottom and live partially off the rich, or make enough to at least be middle class. Of course the more you make the better as most of us realize. In fact so many people realize it that the middle class is shrinking. The progressives will tell you that this income disparity is bad, but nothing could be farther from the truth.<br />
<br />
Life is about freedom, and as a late online acquaintance of mine used to say: <i>"Liberty and equality are incompatible, since liberty means diversity while equality means uniformity. Free men are not equal and equal men are not free."</i><BR /><BR />]]></content:encoded>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://vista.powerblogs.com/posts/1210103037.shtml">
<title>Gas Price Breakdown</title>
<link>http://vista.powerblogs.com/posts/1210103037.shtml</link>
<description>&amp;nbsp;...</description>
<dc:creator>Sandi</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-06T19:05+00:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[&nbsp;<br />
This would be better if it included Federal and state taxes in the breakdown.<br />
<br />
<img src="http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i125/Blogger-Sandi/Posts/GasPrices.jpg" alt="Vista" border="0"><br />
<br />
Via Steve at  <a href="http://grandpajohn.blogspot.com/2008/05/no-kidding-from-reliapundit.html">Grandpa John's</a><BR /><BR />]]></content:encoded>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://vista.powerblogs.com/posts/1209706402.shtml">
<title>Is Human Caused Global Warming Settled?</title>
<link>http://vista.powerblogs.com/posts/1209706402.shtml</link>
<description>&amp;nbsp;...</description>
<dc:creator>Sandi</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-02T05:05+00:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[&nbsp;<br />
If you are swayed by the national news and the IPCC reports you might think that it is. Well it ain't. Not by a long shot.<br />
<br />
For those who think humans are responsible for global warming these four clips are a must. Laypeople with some knowledge of scientific principle are generally skeptical of the tactics used my the IPCC and pressure from politics and the media. These clips are plain enough that you don't have to be a scientist to understand.<br />
<br />
CO2 is a greenhouse gas although one of the lesser effective ones, but CO2 is in no way a pollutant. Please watch this four part series by Professor Bob Carter who will use the scientific method on the popular theory that global warming is linked to CO2 levels.<br />
<br />
<br />
<center><font size="4">Climate Change - Is CO2 the cause? - Pt 1 of 4<br />
<br />
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/FOLkze-9GcI&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/FOLkze-9GcI&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object><br />
<br />
<br />
Climate Change - Is CO2 the cause? - Pt 2 of 4<br />
<br />
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/vN06JSi-SW8&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/vN06JSi-SW8&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object><br />
<br />
<br />
Climate Change - Is CO2 the cause? - Pt 3 of 4<br />
<br />
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/iCXDISLXTaY&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/iCXDISLXTaY&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object><br />
<br />
<br />
Climate Change - Is CO2 the cause? - Pt 4 of 4</font><br />
<br />
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/bpQQGFZHSno&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/bpQQGFZHSno&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></center><BR /><BR />]]></content:encoded>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://vista.powerblogs.com/posts/1209514766.shtml">
<title>Mmm Free Ben &amp; Jerry's!</title>
<link>http://vista.powerblogs.com/posts/1209514766.shtml</link>
<description>&amp;nbsp;...</description>
<dc:creator>Sandi</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30T00:04+00:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[&nbsp;<br />
Today the 29th of April is <a href="http://www.benjerry.com/features/30th_birthday/">Ben & Jerry's 30th annual FREE CONE DAY!</a><br />
<br />
Head over to your nearest Ben & Jerry's scoop shop location and treat yourself.<BR /><BR />]]></content:encoded>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://vista.powerblogs.com/posts/1209464273.shtml">
<title>AI Isn't Childs Play</title>
<link>http://vista.powerblogs.com/posts/1209464273.shtml</link>
<description>&amp;nbsp;...</description>
<dc:creator>Sandi</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29T10:04+00:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[&nbsp;<br />
<a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/04/080421162240.htm">This Science Daily article seems to agree</a> to a small degree.<br />
<br />
For several decades many AI researchers have told us that artificial intelligence is around the corner, with the dream to put a robot in every home. Do our menial and dirty jobs for us, while waiting on us hand and foot. I have had a few discussion with Deans World readers on AI and am usually outnumbered. But it seems to me that the goal posts on the definition of AI keep getting moved until a wristwatch or hand calculator qualify as AI.<br />
<br />
We see all kinds of robot projects with the goal to mimic human behavior. IBM's Deep Blue is certainly impressive defeating world Chess champion Garry Kasparov in 1997. But Deep Blue is a computer program and database that harbors no intelligence artificial or otherwise. It only follows preprogrammed instructions on how to make the next move. It does not ponder a move nor do a wit of thinking.<br />
<br />
True AI would be something like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HAL_9000">Arthur C. Clarke's HAL9000</a> in Space Odyssey. I don't doubt that real AI is possible and I'm sure some day we will see it, but I've seen little substantiative progress in the last couple of decades.<br />
<br />
<div style="float:left; font-size:70%; color:#333; text-align:center;"><a href="http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i125/Blogger-Sandi/Posts/asimo.jpg"><img src="http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i125/Blogger-Sandi/Posts/asimo_thumb.jpg" hspace="10" vspace="10" /></a><br />
Click for larger</div><br />
Honda's Asimo Robot can run, jump up and down, climb up and down stairs and other impressive feats <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLGk9Q49y7k">as this short clip shows</a>. But he has no rudimentary intelligence of his own. The intelligence is in the expert programming. The life-like appearance due to mechanical expertise combined with programming to give canned life-like appearances. In the clip the robot stopped and looked at himself in the mirror, stopped and admired another robot on display simply because the programmers programmed to do so. He had no curiosity nor inner compulsion to do it on his own. Heck he has no thought process to know what he is looking at.<br />
<div style="float:right; font-size:70%; color:#333; text-align:center;"><a href="http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i125/Blogger-Sandi/Posts/icub.jpg"><img src="http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i125/Blogger-Sandi/Posts/icub_thumb.jpg" hspace="10" vspace="10" /></a><br />
Click for larger</div><br />
<br />
Developers of iCub robots want to develop leaning the way children do. By developing ability to understand and interact with their surrounding world through experiences. Six projects across Europe are working on six different aspect of the learning process.<br />
<br />
<div class="bquote">The six projects include one from Imperial College London that will explore how ‘mirror neurons’ found in the human brain can be translated into a digital application. ‘Mirror neurons’, discovered in the early 1990s, trigger memories of previous experiences when humans are trying to understand the physical actions of others. A separate team at UPF Barcelona will also work on iCub’s ‘cognitive architecture’.<br />
<br />
At the same time, a team headquartered at UPMC in Paris will explore the dynamics needed to achieve full body control for iCub. Meanwhile, researchers at TUM Munich will work on the development of iCub’s manipulation skills. A project team from the University of Lyons will explore internal simulation techniques – something our brains do when planning actions or trying to understand the actions of others.<br />
<br />
Over in Turkey, a team based at METU in Ankara will focus almost exclusively on language acquisition and the iCub’s ability to link objects with verbal utterances.</div><br />
This whole project causes my eyes to roll. I've a feeling that they will learn little if anything about AI. Like Honda's Asimo and Sony's Quro this project will, in the end, be a project to see how closely human behavior can be mimicked.<br />
<br />
The cart is before the horse here. We won't learn about, and produce AI (which again I think is entirely possible) by making robots that act like humans. We are getting closer to reverse engineering the human brain. That is the direction AI needs to pursue. When we understand intelligence and what it is, then, and only then will be have the foundation to build machines and robots with artificial intelligence. We are making robots with the ability to move like humans. Rudimentary abilities to classify objects and recall them (although without thought). But no amount of classifying their surroundings and recalling them will be more than a database: one without curiosity or intelligence.<br />
<br />
First lean precisely what intelligence is, then apply it to machine systems. When that happens AI will truly be "Child's Play."<BR /><BR />]]></content:encoded>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://vista.powerblogs.com/posts/1209084398.shtml">
<title>Elephant Art</title>
<link>http://vista.powerblogs.com/posts/1209084398.shtml</link>
<description>&amp;nbsp;...</description>
<dc:creator>Sandi</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-25T00:04+00:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[&nbsp;<br />
MY father used to say "If a pig flies you don't criticize him for doing so badly." I think the same can be said for Elephants that paint as the picture below shows.<br />
<center><br />
<img src="http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i125/Blogger-Sandi/Posts/Elephant_Art.jpg" alt="Vista" border="0"></center><br />
<br />
Watching the videos below just blew me away. Some say that this isn't creativity or talent, but something the elephants learn by Rote. I choose to believe otherwise.<br />
<br />
<br />
<center><b>Elephants Painting Flowers</b><br />
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/He7Ge7Sogrk&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/He7Ge7Sogrk&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></center><br />
<br />
<br />
Their work may only be a bit above human stick figure painting. Nevertheless it's probably a little better than I and other artistically challenged humans can do.<br />
<br />
<div class="bquote">Watch this elephant, rescued from abusive treatment in Burma, now paint an amazing self portrait. You'll be amazed at how his talent unfolds.<br />
<br />
So touched by their horrific backgrounds and loving personalities, ExoticWorldGifts.com now supports, "Starving Elephant Artisans" by selling their paintings so they can continue to have a new life in Thailand.</div><br />
<br />
<center><br />
<b>Elephant Painting Self Portrait</b><br />
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/He7Ge7Sogrk&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/He7Ge7Sogrk&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></center><br />
<br />
<br />
That should be worth a plug for <a href="http://www.exoticworldgifts.com/">Exotic World Gifts</a> who sells the elephant paintings.<br />
<br />
H/T <a href="http://www.deanesmay.com/2008/04/24/elephant-painting/#comments">Dean's World</a><br />
<BR /><BR />]]></content:encoded>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://vista.powerblogs.com/posts/1208527840.shtml">
<title>Worlds Tiniest Girl</title>
<link>http://vista.powerblogs.com/posts/1208527840.shtml</link>
<description>Post Source: Telegraph...</description>
<dc:creator>Sandi</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-18T14:04+00:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="right">Post Source: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/04/06/ntiny106.xml">Telegraph</a></div><br />
Age 15, height 1ft-11in, weight 11 pounds. Wow! That's about half a pound per inch. She sure is a cutie though. I could take her home and put her on my nicknack shelf.    ;) <br />
<br />
In the picture below on the left the 13 month old boy is bigger than she is. On the right is Jyoti and her classmates.<br />
<br />
<div align="center"><img src="http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i125/Blogger-Sandi/Posts/tinytot.jpg" width="98%" /></div><br />
<br />
<div class="bquote">The teenager, who is the world's smallest girl according to the Indian Book of Records, has a form of dwarfism called achondroplasia. Now fully grown, she weighs just 11 lb.<br />
<br />
Far from being unhappy about her tiny size, Jyoti says that she enjoys the celebrity status her height has brought her.<br />
<br />
"I am proud of being small. I love the attention I get," she told the Sunday Mirror.<br />
<br />
"I'm just the same as other people. I eat like you, dream like you. I don't feel any different."<br />
<br />
Jyoti attends her local high school, in Nagpur, India, where she studies alongside classmates of her own age, though she sits at a specially made miniature desk.</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://vista.powerblogs.com/posts/1208294220.shtml">
<title>McCain or Obama?</title>
<link>http://vista.powerblogs.com/posts/1208294220.shtml</link>
<description>&amp;nbsp;...</description>
<dc:creator>Sandi</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15T21:04+00:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[&nbsp;<br />
One of the <a href="http://www.deanesmay.com/2008/04/15/we-are-all-moderates/">co-bloggers over at Deans World</a> has a post up with some interesting figures.<br />
<br />
<div class="bquote">The US federal government currently spends about 21% of GDP. If John McCain wins the election and gets every single one of his economic proposals passed, the government would probably be spending about 18% of GDP when McCain leaves office. And if Obama wins and gets all of his economic policies passed, the government would probably be spending no more than 25% of GDP when he leaves office, and likewise if Clinton wins.<br />
<br />
There’s a real, substantive difference between taxes and government services at 18% vs at 25%, but it’s a very modest difference relative to the range of government sizes among industrialized nations. The Swedish government, for instance, spends 53% of GDP, while the government of Singapore spends less than 10%. And in terms of the entire sweep of human history, the difference is more modest still. Sweden is neither the Soviet Union nor the Paris Commune, and Singapore is no 19th century United States.</div><br />
Where his figures come from are not linked so I can't vouch for the accuracy. However I have no doubt what-so-ever that McCain wants less federal government programs than Obama. Hillary and Obama both will try to increase the size of social programs. Hillary's big push will be for universal health care for all people which is a big enough program that it won't have much change of getting thorough even a Democrat controlled congress. Obama OTOH I believe will push for a lot of smaller program that will and bloat the size of government just<BR /><BR /> as much as government run health care. But because it would be in small chunks most of it would have much better chance of getting through congress.<br />
<br />
The real dilemma for me this elections is that there are no candidates I like left in the race. Well that isn't uncommon in an election, I didn't really want to vote for Bush either. These three though are all really distasteful. Of the three Hillary would be the one I would prefer to vote for with my nose held, but it looks more and more like she is out.<br />
<br />
McCain is objectionable because I believe that under his administration illegal immigration will become an even bigger problem. Amnesty for all (I know he doesn't call it that) and lack of enthusiasm for border control is unacceptable. That leaves me with a choice between a better economy but with out of control illegal immigration, or out of control government spending with immigration control an unknown.<br />
<br />
In the past I have said that I can not, and will not vote for McCain, but I may have to eat those words.<BR /><BR />]]></content:encoded>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://vista.powerblogs.com/posts/1207642069.shtml">
<title>How Your Taxes Are Spent</title>
<link>http://vista.powerblogs.com/posts/1207642069.shtml</link>
<description>Post Source: MSNBC...</description>
<dc:creator>Sandi</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-08T08:04+00:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="right">Post Source: <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23924282/">MSNBC</a></div><br />
Tax time approaches quickly, while I have been procrastinating. It looks like I will have to file for an extension again this year. Not that I owe anything, but you still get fined for late filing.<br />
<br />
Anyway while contemplating getting started today I ran across this article. While it doesn't tell you where every dollar goes, it does a pretty good job of laying out where our money goes in easy to understand terms.<br />
<br />
<div class="bquote">Like many tax filers, you're probably asking yourself: Just where does my money go when the government gets its hands on it?<br />
<br />
Alas, it's not as simple a question as it may seem. For those of you who have trouble balancing your checkbook, imagine trying to keep track of where $4.1 trillion goes. That’s what was spent on your behalf at all levels of federal state and local government last year.<br />
<br />
Even with armies of accountants and auditors, it’s hard to know with certainty exactly where your taxes ended up. For starters, you pay taxes based on a calendar year; the government spends it based on a fiscal year that begins Oct. 1. Even if the calendars matched up, the journey your tax dollars embark on depends a lot on things like how much you make, how you spend it and where you live. ....<br />
<br />
So where did your money go after you sent it off to Tax Heaven? One way to find out is to look at the government's bills. If the government sat down at the kitchen table to try to see where its paycheck went, here’s — very roughly — where it went in 2007.<br />
<br />
To make the math a little easier, let’s assume the government made $52,000 a year — or $1,000 a week — which is about the median household income in the U.S. (The real number was $48,200 in 2006. And keep in mind that $1,000 a week doesn’t include taxes. But you’re the government — you don’t pay taxes.)<br />
<br />
The biggest government bill last year was for a category called “income security” ($220 of that $1,000 weekly paycheck) — which includes Social Security ($115), along with other social services like welfare ($46), disability payments ($35) and unemployment  insurance ($7). The next biggest chunk went to pay for health care ($203), which includes Medicaid and Medicare.<br />
<br />
Keeping our country — and your neighborhood — safe cost almost $200 a week, including national defense ($132), along with spending on “public order and safety” ($65), which included police ($27), prisons ($18), courts ($12) and fighting fires ($8).<br />
<br />
Education took the next biggest slice ($158) — most of which went to pay for elementary and secondary schools ($117). Much of the rest helped pay for college ($28). About $2 a week of our $1,000 a week paycheck went to pay for public libraries.<br />
<br />
Then there’s "general public service" — or the cost of government itself.  Unfortunately, government — like many Americans — has been living beyond its means and spending more than it collects in taxes. To make up the difference, state and federal treasuries filled in the gap by selling more debt — roughly the same as you or me using our credit cards. So the biggest single component of the $143 cost of running federal, state and local government last year was the interest on the money borrowed on your behalf ($90). Think of it as the minimum monthly payment on your government’s credit card.<br />
<br />
The cost of running all levels of government also included salaries and expenses for the executive and legislative branches ($21) and the cost of collecting taxes ($11).<br />
<br />
After that, the bills looked pretty manageable — but then you only had about $79 left. Those bills included highways ($25), agriculture ($8) air transport ($4), air and water quality ($7) and the space program ($3). Rounding out the list were housing and community service ($10) and recreation and culture ($7).</div><br />
I feel so much better now.... Not!<BR /><BR />]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>