Skinning: Wordpress • Invision • Expression Engine • phpBB3
Kindergartener Voted Out By Classmates
by Sandi
Post Source: TCPalm

This just isn't right. I don't know if this teacher is just plain stupid, or mean.

PORT ST. LUCIE — Melissa Barton said she is considering legal action after her son's kindergarten teacher led his classmates to vote him out of class.

After each classmate was allowed to say what they didn't like about Barton's 5-year-old son, Alex, his Morningside Elementary teacher said they were going to take a vote, Barton said.

By a 14 to 2 margin, the class voted him out of the class.

Barton said her son is in the process of being diagnosed with Aspberger's, a type of high-functioning autism. Alex began the testing process in February for an official diagnosis under the suggestion of Morningside Principal Marsha Cully.

In the video below Barton with her son, Alex, was interviewed exclusively by CBS Harry Smith live from West Palm Beach, Fla.




Via Dean's World

Posted Tuesday May 27, 2008 | Catagory: (Education) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
Advocate For Unfairness...
by Sandi
 
...and other commencement advice for graduates by P.J. O'Rourke in the LA Times Opinion column.

Here are some excerpts, but you'll want to read the whole thing. It's really quite good advice for everyone, not just young graduates.

1. Go out and make a bunch of money!

Here we are living in the world's most prosperous country, surrounded by all the comforts, conveniences and security that money can provide. Yet no American political, intellectual or cultural leader ever says to young people, "Go out and make a bunch of money." Instead, they tell you that money can't buy happiness. Maybe, but money can rent it.

There's nothing the matter with honest moneymaking. Wealth is not a pizza, where if I have too many slices you have to eat the Domino's box. In a free society, with the rule of law and property rights, no one loses when someone else gets rich.

Well as I always say: Money can't buy happiness, it sure can help you look in a lot more places. It is my belief that income disparity is created by two things. Our progressive tax system and welfare. As long as you take enough from the wealthy to keep the lowest class comfortable they are happy to stay in that state. Remove that incentive (except for the very needy that cannot work or are mentally challenged) and people will provide for themselves.

2. Don't be an idealist!

Don't chain yourself to a redwood tree. Instead, be a corporate lawyer and make $500,000 a year. No matter how much you cheat the IRS, you'll still end up paying $100,000 in property, sales and excise taxes. That's $100,000 to schools, sewers, roads, firefighters and police. You'll be doing good for society. Does chaining yourself to a redwood tree do society $100,000 worth of good?

Idealists are also bullies. The idealist says, "I care more about the redwood trees than you do. I care so much I can't eat. I can't sleep. It broke up my marriage. And because I care more than you do, I'm a better person. And because I'm the better person, I have the right to boss you around."

Get a pair of bolt cutters and liberate that tree.

Who does more for the redwoods and society anyway -- the guy chained to a tree or the guy who founds the "Green Travel Redwood Tree-Hug Tour Company" and makes a million by turning redwoods into a tourist destination, a valuable resource that people will pay just to go look at?

So make your contribution by getting rich. Don't be an idealist.

I'll have to agree and disagree someone on this one. Making money takes a certain amount of idealism. However his point is well taken that too much idealism misdirected is counter-productive.

3. Get politically uninvolved!

All politics stink. Even democracy stinks. Imagine if our clothes were selected by the majority of shoppers, which would be teenage girls. I'd be standing here with my bellybutton exposed. Imagine deciding the dinner menu by family secret ballot. I've got three kids and three dogs in my family. We'd be eating Froot Loops and rotten meat.

But let me make a distinction between politics and politicians. Some people are under the misapprehension that all politicians stink. Impeach George W. Bush, and everything will be fine. Nab Ted Kennedy on a DUI, and the nation's problems will be solved.

But the problem isn't politicians -- it's politics. Politics won't allow for the truth. And we can't blame the politicians for that. Imagine what even a little truth would sound like on today's campaign trail:

"No, I can't fix public education. The problem isn't the teachers unions or a lack of funding for salaries, vouchers or more computer equipment The problem is your kids!"

Truth in politics, what a novel idea. But honesty will never fly. Besides the people know politicians lie and want them to do so, and will defend the lies to the bitter end. Visiting any forum that discusses political news will easily convince you of that.

4. Forget about fairness!

We all get confused about the contradictory messages that life and politics send.

Life sends the message, "I'd better not be poor. I'd better get rich. I'd better make more money than other people." Meanwhile, politics sends us the message, "Some people make more money than others. Some are rich while others are poor. We'd better close that 'income disparity gap.' It's not fair!"

Well, I am here to advocate for unfairness. I've got a 10-year-old at home. She's always saying, "That's not fair." When she says this, I say, "Honey, you're cute. That's not fair. Your family is pretty well off. That's not fair. You were born in America. That's not fair. Darling, you had better pray to God that things don't start getting fair for you." What we need is more income, even if it means a bigger income disparity gap.

Which makes number 1 about making money all important. We either stay at the bottom and live partially off the rich, or make enough to at least be middle class. Of course the more you make the better as most of us realize. In fact so many people realize it that the middle class is shrinking. The progressives will tell you that this income disparity is bad, but nothing could be farther from the truth.

Life is about freedom, and as a late online acquaintance of mine used to say: "Liberty and equality are incompatible, since liberty means diversity while equality means uniformity. Free men are not equal and equal men are not free."

Posted Wednesday May 7, 2008 | Catagory: (Education) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
Government the Cause of High College Tuition?
by Sandi
Post Source: WSJ Opinion Journal

It appears that the answer to that question is quite likely a resounding yes.

ronically, these government handouts are creating the tuition problem. Tuition has risen about three percentage points faster than inflation every year for the past quarter-century. At the same time, the feds have put more and more money behind student loans and other financial aid. The government is slowly becoming a third-party tuition payer, with all the price distortions one would expect. Every time tuition rises, the government makes up the difference; colleges thus cheerfully raise tuition (and budgets), knowing the government will step in.

As a result, "colleges have little incentive to cut costs," says economist Richard Vedder, the author of "Going Broke by Degree: Why College Costs Too Much." Mr. Vedder explains that there are now twice as many university administrators per student as there were in the 1970s. Faculty members are paid more to teach fewer hours, and colleges have turned their campuses into "country clubs." Princeton's new $136 million dorm, according to BusinessWeek, has "triple-glazed mahogany casement windows made of leaded glass" and "the dining hall boasts a 35-foot ceiling gabled in oak and a 'state of the art servery,' " whatever a servery is.


Posted Friday December 14, 2007 | Catagory: (Education) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
Compelled Political Views
by Sandi
Post Source: Townhall.com

Back in 1943 the US Supreme Court ruled 8-1 in West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette that the school district violated the rights of students by forcing them to salute the American flag.

If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein. If there are any circumstances which permit an exception, they do not now occur to us.

We think the action of the local authorities in compelling the flag salute and pledge transcends constitutional limitations on their power and invades the sphere of intellect and spirit which it is the purpose of the First Amendment to our Constitution to reserve from all official control.

George Will in his Sunday column shows us several examples of teachers at universities across the nation that not only routinely ignore the first amendment, but penalize students who do not hold to the liberal views of the teacher with failing grades.

In 2005, Emily Brooker, a social work student at Missouri State University, was enrolled in a class taught by a professor who advertised himself as a liberal and insisted that social work is a liberal profession. At first, a mandatory assignment for his class was to advocate homosexual foster homes and adoption, with all students required to sign an advocacy letter, on university stationery, to the state Legislature.

When Brooker objected on religious grounds, the project was made optional. But shortly before the final exam she was charged with a "Level 3," the most serious, violation of professional standards. In a two-and-a-half-hour hearing -- which she was forbidden to record and her parents were barred from attending -- the primary subject was her refusal to sign the letter. She was ordered to write a paper ("Written Response about My Awareness") explaining how she could "lessen the gap" between her ethics and those of the social work profession. When she sued the university, it dropped the charges and made financial and other restitution.

It just so happens that I disagree with Brooker's philosophy on gays, but her stance is legal and valid on religious, personal or any other grounds. Nor is it necessarily bigotry, although it may be. But even if it were bigotry, in this country we cannot punish people for their views or beliefs. The real bigotry is the progressive left believing that what students think should not only be controlled, but enforced.

I think the mindset that holds this extreme left view is summed up in a comment at Dean's World this morning by Brian Tiemann:

But there's a big difference between people who believe that a nation's population ought to be all dedicated to a common cause in order to be a part of it—"Love it or leave it"—and people who believe that a "nation" consists solely of a set of arbitrary borders and the people that happen to be born inside them.

It's the latter model that says "diversity" is the most commendable thing in a nation, that there should be multiculturalism rather than a "melting pot", and that nationalism is an embarrassing relic of the past. A world built of this model ends up being homogenous, an endless litany of dysfunctional parliamentary democracies with state-funded health care and human-rights guarantees that are hardly worth the paper they're "granted" on. It's mediocre, but at least it's something everyone is too apathetic to be dissatisfied with.

But for those who believe in the former model, where the pull of the Constitution is in and of itself enough to make you want to change your nationality, there's something better to aspire to. It's not perfection, it can be destructive, but it's a belief that humanity can do better than the status quo.


Posted Tuesday October 16, 2007 | Catagory: (Education, Social Issues) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
Teacher Removed For Showing Iraq Documentary
by Sandi

Michael Baker, one of Nebraska's top teachers was removed from his geography classroom for showing the documentary “Baghdad ER” to his class.

Posted Saturday May 12, 2007 | Catagory: (Education, War) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
The Old Man…..the Lock, and the Clock. Part I
by Galt
He was bent over, sitting at a bench focused on some task with such intensity; I thought only I'd ever known. Some mysterious tools I had never seen moved with deliberate precession, held in huge but lightening quick hands, as I peered into the window of his shop, my nose pressed close to the glass. I was entranced, and little did I know, hooked then on what was to come.

It was Friday, and I’d just cut classes again at John Adams High, word of another race riot was about to begin with another school Jefferson High and I knew better than to hang. Hough and Euclid in Cleveland, Ohio was not a place one wanted to be.

So there I was, with time on my hands, before the afternoon caddy job in Shaker Heights was to begin and my part time job at the bowling alley on weekend nights where I repaired AMF automatic pin setters. I was underage with no working papers so hidden from view by the owner, but my sister and I had to eat, and I wasn’t looking forward to going home anyway. I also had to do collections for my 3:30 am paper route, for the Cleveland Plain Dealer, dreading the huge Sunday edition to come.

I felt guilty with all those thoughts whirling in my head, as I stood their looking in. I knew I should be making extra money carrying doubles that day, but for some reason I could not move from my spot. My eyes took in the shop as I stood my books in hand, watching the old man work. Above his bench hanging on the wall above was an old and small Grandfathers Clock, which I knew about from living in Maysville, Kentucky with a woman, Bessie who raised me for a time, as she had a standing one in the foyer that would wake the dead when it chimed that looked similar and was my job to wind.

The shop was small, mostly darkened, but narrow and long, that went all the way down to a back alley, and the shop was filled with wondrous and intriguing mechanical devises, I couldn’t quite make out. The bench had tools hanging in wooden holders, and though it seemed cluttered, I could tell everything had a place, the light shinning down from a shaded lamp, his hands moving from his task reaching to put back or take down some other tool. His huge hands moved like the dance of a ballerina, each move calculated and deliberate with no wasted motion. It was a thing of beauty, and reminded me of Bessie in her kitchen preparing meals for the folks in her old age home. She was a big woman, but moved the same way.

I don’t know why I stopped that day, as I’d walked past that shop many times from school; the 5 miles like a gift of release, as the cost of bus tickets were out of the question, making money was the driving force then, and every nickel counted. I had looked in many times before as I went past, but only a short interested glance or two, as other things were more important than some old man sitting at a bench, except that day.

So, there I stood and watched, the old man never taking his eyes off his task. Then daylight burst through the somewhat dark shop, except for his bench, as a door opened from the back alley. I moved over towards the door of the shop to get a better view, and two men with a huge black box, were rolling it in on a hand truck, with some effort I thought. Later I would find out it was a safe. Out of the corner of my eye, my nose still pressed to the window, I saw the old man move, and his bald head glistened as the light from the work bench played on it, and I laughed out loud.

I watched as he headed to the back of the shop, but I could see he was stooped, and unable to fully stand, yet moved like a cat, and I knew he’d been a big man tall and strong at some time in his life. I choked off the laughter. I was a tall skinny and gangly kid, and had always admired the descriptions of Greek athletes I’d read about in books. I felt sad and ashamed at my laugh, with what I saw as his body played against the daylight his shadows moving against the lighted walls, as that stooped body headed down the long hall, to the back alley.

I moved back to my original place, to look at the bench to see what had been hidden by his bent over body, and there on the clean orderly bench, lay several locks and an old chess game clock. I could not see them clearly, but I knew what they were. Parts were scattered here and there, and one lock seemed to be complete, but even in the scattered placement you could see order. For some reason I can’t explain to this day, I felt strange, and I could feel my heart pounding as I had to step back from the glass, to catch my balance, books slipping from my hands.

I took a minute to focus my eyes which were now accustomed to the darkness inside, and looked up at the shop front, and saw the sign that read “Locks and Clocks.” That was it, nothing more, no names no other words, as my head finally cleared my hands still trembling, I reached down to pick up the books I’d dropped, my heart still pounding. I went back to the window, but the daylight was gone, and the old man could not be seen down the long hallway, so I waited a few minutes, but he did not return. My guilt I supposed at the time got the better of me, but other thoughts I can’t describe played in my head as I left and ran the rest of the way home, but I vowed I’d be back. It was like I’d stepped into another world that day and it shook me.

Fall would come early that year, the temperatures dropping and with them, would also come the worst snowstorm Cleveland had seen in years. I still had part of the summer left, and had to make as much money as I could somehow sensing the long winter to come, and my loss of income. Being a Doubles Caddy paid well, 12 bucks for 18 holes, and sometimes tips. I was glad in a way I’d be late, as I was not built for doubles bags, but singles got you 6 bucks for 18 holes so I wouldn’t lose much. The paper route paid pretty well, especially since I’d built it up to 179 customers that summer, and I looked forward to holiday tips, that were great, since people had a different mind-set then.

My daily focus however was now on the old man and the Locks and Clocks shop, as all other things somehow became less intense, even if important. For three weeks I cut classes, skipped school, and day after day stood at that window for some reason I could not fathom never daring to enter. I never got a B except once in all my schooling, and never needed the books, as mostly it came too easy. So, I didn’t sweat the school, since the public school was 4 years behind what I already knew, and you could get lost in a school with 3000 others, so that old man and the shop took over my existence.

Each day, I stood transfixed as I watched trying to catch a glimpse of what he was doing, and my love for the mechanical perhaps from my fathers ability with the tool an die company, as I heard later he was considered one of the best, and an inventor of some machined device he made, that cured the failing of bomb bay doors to open properly in B-17’s in WWII. In any event, I had a mechanical inquisitive mind, so there I stood each day watching.

It was a Monday, one of those days I decided again that school could do without me, and I’d become rather adept at writing notes, it was early so I headed to the shop. I supposed I looked a sight, as people always seemed to stare, at what was considered in those days as white trash, old beat up 4 year old sneakers, and clothes that didn’t fit, but I didn’t care, as being a half-breed I ignored their stares, I’d been that road early on. Once a cop stopped and asked me what I was doing, like I was going to rob the place, but with my gift of gab, so I thought… they watched but left me alone. I’d find out later why they did.

I’d finished my route early, and was a bit worn out, but the store front had a small ledge I could sit on, as I peered into the shop that day. I’d been sitting for some time, when suddenly the old man turned looking straight at me, something he’d never done all those days and weeks past. My heart jumped, and I wanted to run, having been caught, but I sat transfixed for what seemed like some very long minutes, my gaze on his eyes, deep set, not cold but not friendly either as he stared at me.

He raised his arm, his big hand motioned to me to come in. I thought at first he was looking at someone behind me so I turned, to look, but there was no one on the walk but me. I turned back, and he motioned to me again, and his eyes softened a bit and I knew he meant me, and I felt shame at the way I was dressed, but exhilarated and safe all at the same time. I stood up, reached for the brass knob on the door, and turned it.

I recall to this day that moment, a bit scared, tears in my eyes, as I wiped my nose, and went in. I quietly closed the door, as though I had entered a quiet church, with respect for the silence and stood there unable to move. He never took his eyes off me, and never spoke a word, as his hand pointed to a stool sitting next to him. That stool had never been there before in all the days and weeks I stared through that window. I tried to gather myself together, and stand tall, and then cursed myself remembering his walk to the back of the store, and the only time I’d ever seen him move from the bench. Finally my legs moved, as his head turned back to his work.

I moved slowly as I glanced around the shop, clocks of all kinds, locks of every description covered the walls, keys of every conceivable variety hung on one wall, but the sounds of ticking clocks, and the smells of oils, and other things that my young mind could not comprehend then flooded my senses. I couldn’t believe my good fortune, as the only place I’d ever felt at home, was my attic, where I built a complete city of trains, I’d swapped for some baseball cards from a kid at school since his parents wouldn’t let him have them. It was my escape, like my long walks, and the only clear reality of a world I could not understand then. With my head swimming my legs finally got me to the stool.

The space in front of me as I sat down on the stool was clean, except for a hand scrawled note, with only one word on it. WATCH.

The world ceased to exist that day, as did the remaining days to come that summer. Over the years some moments, have become a blur yet are still intense…they are crystal moments in my mind so more is yet to come, from the Old Man, the Lock and the Clock, and the lessons learned.

(To be continued)
Posted Wednesday February 7, 2007 | Catagory: (Education) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
Taliban in, Military Out at Yale
by Sandi

The mind of the elite left never ceases to amaze me, especially when it involves our institutions of higher learning. While Yale continues to block ROTC, they welcome former deputy foreign secretary of the Taliban Sayed Rahmatullah Hashemi.

Via The Queen.

Posted Monday March 6, 2006 | Catagory: (Education) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
High School Field Trips to Protest Rallies
by Sandi
Report via Townhall

Los Angeles educrats allow kids to skip classes and provides buses and adult supervision to hundreds of high school students from 10 high schools to attend protest rallies.

The Los Angeles Unified School District took things a step further. The district helpfully agreed to provide buses — that's right, buses — as well as "adult supervision" to the nearly 800 high school students who walked out of 10 high schools. District officials said they thought it best to provide adults and transportation, since, you know, the kids intended to go to the rally, anyway. "Our issue . . . was safety," said the district's chief operating officer, "and I think we fulfilled our mission, frankly."

Really? Forgive some of us for thinking that the district's mission was . . . education. And, given the less-than-superb academic performance of Los Angeles public school students, the educrats, one would have thought, would have frowned on allowing the kids to skip classes.

Our tax dollars at work... but for whom?

Read more...
Posted Wednesday November 9, 2005 | Catagory: (Education) | Permalink
2 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
UW Eau Claire Bans Dormitory Bible Studies
by Sandi
This attack on freedom is beyond belief. Via Badger Blogger.

In a shameful attack on freedom of religion, the University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire (UWEC) has banned resident assistants (RAs) from leading Bible studies in their own dormitories.

The university claims the ban is necessary because some students might not feel RAs who lead Bible studies are "approachable."

Steve another blogger commenting at Badger Blogger was good enough to refrence Wisconsin Constitution: Article I, Section 18 which the UW apparently is in violation of.

Freedom of worship; liberty of conscience; state religion; public funds. The right of every person to worship Almighty God according to the dictates of conscience shall never be infringed; nor shall any person be compelled to attend, erect or support any place of worship, or to maintain any ministry, without consent; nor shall any control of, or interference with, the rights of conscience be permitted, or any preference be given by law to any religious establishments or modes of worship; nor shall any money be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of religious societies, or religious or theological seminaries.

Note that it doesn't say: ...shall never be infringed unless someone feels that person might not be "approachable."

Update: US Representative Mark Green responds in a letter to UW-Eau Claire Interim Chancellor Vicki Lord Larson.

H/T Boots & Sabers

Posted Thursday November 3, 2005 | Catagory: (Education) | Permalink
3 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
Thought and Belief Warriors in the Classroom
by Sandi
Dispositions theory for accreditation of teachers?

The cultural left has a new tool for enforcing political conformity in schools of education. It is called dispositions theory, and it was set forth five years ago by the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education: Future teachers should be judged by their "knowledge, skills, and dispositions." What are "dispositions"? NCATE's prose made clear that they are the beliefs and attitudes that guide a teacher toward a moral stance. That sounds harmless enough, but it opened a door to reject teaching candidates on the basis of thoughts and beliefs. In 2002, NCATE said that an education school may require a commitment to social justice. William Damon, a professor of education at Stanford, wrote last month that education schools "have been given unbounded power over what candidates may think and do, what they may believe and value."

NCATE vehemently denies that it is imposing groupthink, but the ed schools, essentially a liberal monoculture, use dispositions theory to require support for diversity and a culturally left agenda, including opposition to what the schools sometimes call "institutional racism, classism, and heterosexism." Predictably, some students concluded that thought control would make classroom dissent dangerous. A few students rebelled when a teacher at Brooklyn College School of Education showed Michael Moore's movie Fahrenheit 9/11 in class and dismissed "white English" as "the language of oppressors." Five students filed written complaints and received no formal reply from the college. One was told to leave the school and take an equivalent course at a community college. Two of the complaining students were then accused of plagiarism and marked down one letter grade. The two were refused permission to bring a witness, a tape recorder, or a lawyer to meet with a dean to discuss the matter.

One of NCATE's stated purposes "is the [teaching] profession’s mechanism to help establish high quality teacher preparation." But by whos definition of quality and whos standards? From reading the above article it seems they are more likely to accredit only left leaning standards.

It appears that NCATE also influences School Library Media Education Programs.
Posted Sunday October 16, 2005 | Catagory: (Education) | Permalink
5 Comments | 1 Trackbacks
Separation of State and School, or Rational Thought?
by Sandi

We have too much political struggle and not enough intellectual engagement in our public schools.

While I believe stongly in God, like Thomas Jefferson I believe that religion shouldn't be taught in public schools. There is the ID (Intelligent Design) theory that is causing an unwanted ruckus in some schools. One example is the the lawsuit in Harrisburg, PA claining that intelligent design is not science, has no support from any major American scientific organization and does not belong in a public school science classroom.

But ID doesn't disclaim evolution and states only that there was a hand in guiding evolution, which could be God, aliens or any other source. I can't say I agree a whole lot with ID, but I contend that there is also a lot in the scientific theory of evolution that is also based on faith. Neither has an overwhelming case if very strong at all.

Michael Balter points out that as far as teaching ID in the classroom we are asking the wrong question and says: A national debate over how best to explain the complexity of living organisms would better serve our children, and adults too.

Mr Balter goes on to sum both sides:

Most scientists don't want any debate. Many view intelligent design as simply a new and more sophisticated attempt — "the thinking man's creationism," as Science magazine put it — to slip old-time religion into the classroom. They maintain that the theory of evolution, in particular natural selection, is so well supported by the evidence that it is the consensus scientific view. As such, it deserves a monopoly in school curricula.

Using complex statistics, intelligent-design theorists contend that natural selection fails to fully explain life's complexity, thus alternative explanations to evolution should be considered. As a rule, they don't speculate over who or what did the designing.

Intelligent-design proponents also argue that the scientific consensus on evolution is not rock solid. The Seattle-based Discovery Institute, whose Center for Science and Culture spearheads the intelligent-design campaign, has recruited more than 400 scientists to sign its "Scientific Dissent From Darwinism," which states in part: "We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life."

Mr Balter concludes that the judicially sanctioned monopoly in the classroom may have backfired on the evolutionists.

For one thing, the monopoly strengthens claims by intelligent-design proponents that scientists don't want to be challenged. More important, it shields Darwinian theory from challenges that, when properly refuted, might win over adherents to evolutionary views.

Pro-evolution scientists have little to lose and everything to gain from a nationwide debate. Let's put the leading proponents of intelligent design and our sharpest evolutionary biologists on a national television panel and let them take their best shots. If biblical literalists want to join in, let them. Let's encourage teachers to stage debates in their classrooms or in assemblies. Students can be assigned to one or the other side, and guest speakers can be invited. Among other things, students would learn that science, when properly done, reaches conclusions via experimentation, evidence and argument, not through majority view.

Would this bring religion into the classroom? Religious faith and thinking are already in the classroom, as the opinion polls strongly suggest. And the courts should stay out of it because educators would not be required nor allowed to advocate a religious point of view.

Thanks to Dean's World for the Michael Balter article. You should read Dean's article and his links for much more on this subject.

Now I want to switch to another article by senior editor Jacob Sullum in Reason Magazine who puts up some good arguements for separation of State and Schools. Not that I think there would ever be much political traction for such, but his reasoning highlights how education suffers immeasurably because teaching is so highly politicized. He is talking about the Pennsylvania and another case.

Both of these cases are ostensibly about the separation of church and state. But they also highlight the need for the separation of school and state.

When schools are run by the government, the details of ninth-grade biology classes, the propriety of patriotic rituals, and every other educational issue—ranging from how to teach math and reading to the contents of vending machines—becomes a political issue. Even when the arguments don't end up in court, they generate acrimony and resentment that could be avoided if education were entirely a private matter.

I'm not suggesting that parents would be completely satisfied with their children's schools if the government got out of the education business. No doubt they would always find something to complain about. But if they were not compelled to pay for government-run schools, they would be in a better position to choose schools that reflected their values and preferences, and the compromises they made would be voluntary, instead of terms imposed by the winning side of a political battle.

Sullum makes some good arguements but don't look for any traction politically in the direction of Separation of State and Schools, but whether or not we allow ID to be taught in school classrooms, cooler heads are needed to address these issue. Put another way we need a lot more rational rather than emotional thought.

I've always been of the opinion that private schools are best, and that the federal government has no business in education period. The state and especially the local governments are far better suited to meet their own challenges locally. Nor do I find any clause in Article 1 Section 8 of the constitution that gives the federal government any powers of legislative jurisdiction in any educational matters at all.

Related Posts (on one page):

  1. Intelignet Design Debate Heats UP in the Blogs
  2. Separation of State and School, or Rational Thought?
Posted Tuesday October 4, 2005 | Catagory: (Education) | Permalink
8 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
Janesville Teacher-School District Negotiations
by Sandi

Report via the Janesville Gazette (free registration)

A contract for more than 800 public school teachers is scheduled to begin negotations May 19th and a bitter fight is expected to follow.

What is at the core of the battle is money left from overfunding teachers' health plan. Dave Parr, president of the Janesville Education Association, claims the excess belongs to the teachers.

The money was part of the 2003-05 contract, based on a projection of how much the district would need to pay for teachers' health benefits. The district's health plan is self-funded.

Costs were lower than projected, so the money wasn't needed. Parr said the school board committed to the funding as part of the contract's compensation package, so the money should go to the teachers.

District officials have said the district absorbs the costs in years when the health plan is underfunded, so the district should keep the money when the fund is overfunded.

After months of disagreement, the union made the issue a grievance, now headed for a state mediation-arbitration procedure.

Parr is attempting to use the grievance issue as blackmail leverage in negotations, but the school board isn't feeling very threatened.

"If we win this grievance, they're going to owe us millions of dollars," Parr said.

Parr sees that possibility as leverage at the bargaining table: "We'll negotiate a new contract, and the grievance process can stop at any time, if both parties agree. …

"But it's going to have to be a great offer," Parr said.

The school board doesn't seem to feel exposed.

"The board team is very confident that we have fully implemented the spirit and letter of the law with the '03-05 contract, and we're very confident of the outcome," Evert said.

If Parr was willing to absorb the underfunding I would agree that he has a grievance, but that doesn't seem to be the case. This reminds me of the nefarious coin toss: "Head I win, tails you loose." I don't see how the Education Association could win the grievance, but neither am I familiar with state arbitration procedures on other school board mediations.

Assuming that the union won the arbitration, millions would likely go into the union coffers and the teachers wouldn't see a dime of it. And as usual the taxpayer's would be the big loosers.

I'll keep my eyes open for future updates when available on negotiations or the union's grievance, and post them. My fingers are crossed meanwhile for the union grievance to fail.
Posted Tuesday April 26, 2005 | Catagory: (Education) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks