Skinning: Wordpress • Invision • Expression Engine • phpBB3
The Google, MoveOn, BetrayUs Story is Back
by Sandi

You may remember a couple of weeks ago the internet giant Google banned ads for Republican Sen. Susan Collins’ re-election campaign that were critical of MoveOn.org. Google said that they were pulled because they violated Google’s trademark policy. A policy that is now known not to exist. MoveOn also sent a "cease and desist" letter to CafePress demanding that ads for T-shirts demeaning of MoveOn also be pulled.

Now The Milwaukee Examiner has obtained internal documents that show that both Google and MoveOn were full of it with their claimed policies and reasons given publicly for bans.

Documents obtained by The Examiner show, however, that MoveOn.org’s complaint to Google was part of a broader effort by the advocacy group to silence its critics through threats and intimidation and had nothing to do with preventing fraud.

MoveOn.org filed its trademark complaint with Google on Sept.19 in the midst of the bitter public debate generated by the Petraeus ad. On the same day, MoveOn.org’s Carrie Olson sent a “cease and desist” letter to CafePress.com demanding that the online merchandiser stop selling anti-MoveOn.org T-shirts designed by “Waitress Polly,” a blogger from a military family who created the T-shirts to protest the “General Betray Us” ad.

None of the complaints filed by MoveOn.org with Google or CafePress.com asserted that a “third party” was making fraudulent use of MoveOn.org’s name to collect financial contributions.

Olson, who is MoveOn.org’s chief operating officer, alleged trademark infringement and threatened legal action against CafePress.com if it did not take down the critical ads. She also demanded contact information for ‘Waitress Polly’ and that all orders the anti-MoveOn.org T-shirt be stopped. CafePress.com did as demanded.

Also on Sept. 19, MoveOn.org’s Erik Olson — husband of Carrie Olson — filed a trademark complaint with Google seeking to block any mention of MoveOn.org by any advertiser for any reason, including ads that criticize MoveOn.org by name.

It was this complaint that Google cited as the basis for banning Sen. Collins’ anti-MoveOn.org ads. Google’s complaint form used by MoveOn.org required that the trademark owner make a legal affirmation that the complainant has a “good faith belief” that the use of the trademark is not “permissible under law.”

MoveOn.org, however, did not cite any specific ad, nor did it provide Google with any evidence of trademark infringement. The advocacy group has since said publicly that the Collins ads are permissible under the law.

Google told Collins campaign officials that the company’s “trademark team” was still investigating MoveOn.org’s complaint when The Examiner’s Oct. 11 story was published.

Google hasn’t said how the Collins’ ads were flagged for removal if Google had not yet made a decision on the validity of MoveOn.org’s sweeping trademark claims.

Google also hasn’t explained how MoveOn.org knew Google had a policy that permits trademark owners to implement a universal ban on use of the advocacy group’s name in any Google ad when no such policy is described on the Google Web site.

Likewise, Google could not say how the Collins campaign, or any advertiser, would be expected to know that “MoveOn.org” was a “banned” term since Google does not make such information available to advertisers and does not “auto-reject” ads with banned trademark terms.

Finally, Google hasn’t explained why the Collins campaign was informed Oct. 8 that its anti-MoveOn.org ads were removed due to a “trademark policy violation” when there is no such policy contained in Google’s “terms of service.”

More reading here as the Examiner lays out the Google, MoveOn.org Timeline.


Waitress Polly who received the cease and desist order from MoveOn has the great video below, or visit her blog.



Thanks to Ron at Likelihood of Success for the heads up.

Posted Friday October 26, 2007 | Catagory: (Elections) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
Voting Dogs In Washington
by Sandi

Prosecutors were not amused by a dog voting in Washington. Apparently paw print on the envelope was the dead giveaway.

The second time Duncan M. MacDonald sent in an absentee ballot, an election worker in Federal Way called to ask about the paw print on the envelope. But it took three ballots before the prosecutor contacted the voting dog's owner.

Jane Balogh said she registered the Australian shepherd-terrier mix to vote in protest of a 2005 state voter-registration law that she says makes it too easy for noncitizens to vote.

She put her phone bill in Duncan's name, then used the phone bill as identification to register him as a voter. ...

Acting Prosecuting Attorney Dan Satterberg says his office "can't simply look the other way. They say you should let sleeping dogs lie, but you can't let voting dogs vote."

Picked up on Madison.com news forum (left sidebar).

Posted Friday June 22, 2007 | Catagory: (Elections) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
Why Do Democrats Not Want To Count Each Vote?
by Sandi

If you live in Florida there is a very good chance that your primary vote will not count.

What if Democratic voters turned out for a presidential primary in Florida and their vote didn't count?...

It's an option national Democratic leaders are seriously considering as they grapple with Florida's newly scheduled 2008 presidential primary date, which could upend the national primary process and produce yet another weird Florida election. Consider the scenario:

On Jan. 29, Florida Republicans and Democrats head to the polls to pick presidential nominees. Republican votes count, just as you would expect, but the results for Democrats would be nonbinding. No delegates would be awarded based upon the results and instead party activists and insiders would decide on some later date how to divvy up the state's more than 200 delegates to the Democratic national convention.

Jon Ausman, a Tallahassee Democrat and member of the Democratic National Committee says, "I think it's much higher than 50-50 that we will make Jan. 29 a nonbinding" election.

Knowing that your vote may not count, now there is a way to get out the vote!

H/T to Nick who thinks it is ironic at "[t]he scene of one of the greatest election robberies of all time."

Posted Sunday May 13, 2007 | Catagory: (Elections) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
Ballots Still Cast by Dead Voters
by Sandi
Source The Journal News (New York)

We have all heard of this, it's been anecdotal to elections forever. New York has setup a new database of statewide registered voters that reveals some alarming results on dead voters.

A new statewide database of registered voters contains as many as 77,000 dead people on its rolls, and as many as 2,600 of them have cast votes from the grave, according to a Poughkeepsie Journal computer-assisted analysis.

The Journal's analysis of New York's 3-month-old database is the first to determine the potential for errors and fraud in voting. It matched names, dates of birth and ZIP codes in the state's database of 11.7 million voter registration records against the same information in the Social Security Administration's "Death Master File." That database has 77 million records of deaths dating back to 1937.

I had always assumed that dead voters was just a few isolated cases here and there, but it seems that from this New York Journal Times article it seems that sounding the alarm is needed. Lets take a look at what the database revealed.

Among the Journal's findings:

- There were dead people on the voter rolls in all of New York's 62 counties and people in as many as 45 counties who had votes recorded after they had died.

- One Bronx address was listed as the home for as many as 191 registered voters who had died. The address is 5901 Palisade Ave., in Riverdale, site of the Hebrew Home for the Aged.

- Democrats who cast votes after they died outnumbered Republicans by more than 4 to 1. The reason: Most of them came from Democrat-dominated New York City, where the higher population produced more matches.


Here are some other examples from across the country also revealed in the article.

Last year, at least two dead voters were counted in a Tennessee state Senate race that was decided by fewer than 20 votes. As a result of that and other irregularities, seven poll workers were fired, an entire precinct was dissolved and the election results were voided by the state Senate, forcing the removal of the presumed winner. Three elections workers were indicted for faking the votes.

In 1997, a judge declared a Miami mayoral election invalid because of widespread fraud, including dead voters.

And in one of the more notorious examples, inspectors estimated that as many as 1 in 10 ballots cast in Chicago during the 1982 Illinois gubernatorial election were fraudulent for various reasons, including votes by the dead.

As it is a Federal as well as state law that these dead voters be purged, why aren't they especially as it would remove at least one potential source of fraud? Good question, some say that excessive enthusiasm can cause legitimate voters to be removed through clerical errors, however because most states allow same day registration, this should be easily rectified with proper identification.

Posted Sunday October 29, 2006 | Catagory: (Elections) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
Georgia Tries Again on Voter ID
by Sandi

This is similar to legislation passed last year by the Georgia legislature and signed by the governor. Unfortunately however it was block a federal judge, saying that it amounted to a poll tax because voters who didn't already have approved identification would have to pay a $35 fee.

This year's changes waive that fee and give equipment to each of Georgia's 159 counties to issue the cards.

Critics argued Tuesday, as they have since last year, that the plan unfairly impacts the poor, the elderly and minorities, who are less likely to have driver's licenses.

Supporters say the bill is an effort to crack down on voter fraud.

How it will effect the poor, elderly and minorities is unclear especially if as last year they have a mobile office that travels the state to help them sign up.

Still critics find straws to grab like this one that has me scratching my head. "Our civil rights also dictate that we have a right to have our vote count, not disqualified by someone else who votes illegally." So leaving the process wide open for voter fraud to insure that nobody's vote is disqualified is a good thing?

We are having a similar problem in Wisconsin with a voter ID being repeatedly passed, but here the governor Jim Doyle has used his veto to bock the bill. However this year the congress may have the votes to override the veto.

Posted Tuesday January 24, 2006 | Catagory: (Elections) | Permalink
2 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
Judge to Rule on Washington Governor Election
by Sandi

Report via Yahoo News

Democratic Gov. Christine Gregoire won the Gov. race after three recounts. Rossi won the first count by 261 votes, then by 42 in a machine recount. In a hand recount of nearly 3 million ballots, Gregoire won by 129 votes.

Chelan County Superior Court Judge John Bridges could rule today to declare Rossi the winner forthright, nullify the 2004 outcome which would require a new election in the fall, or find against the GOP and leave Gregoire in office.

But no matter what the outcome the trial should prompts some changes, even if Republican Dino Rossi doesn't win his bid to nullify the election.

Republicans concentrated their attacks on the Democratic stronghold of King County, the state's most populous county. The trial exposed various problems, from inaccurate mail ballot reports to Election Director Dean Logan's admission that he didn't know whether the results were accurate within 129 votes.

In the short run, Republicans say they want a new election for Rossi. But many hope the facts aired at trial will spur more election reform. The state Legislature passed several election reform bills this year, but left many others on the table.

"This is the biggest mess I've ever seen," GOP attorney Dale Foreman said in his opening statement. "The system is broken and it must be fixed."

Throughout the trial, Republican attorneys argued that election errors, illegal votes and fraud stole the election from Rossi.

"This is a case of election fraud by the upper management of the King County elections," Foreman alleged. "This election was stolen from the legal voters of this state by a bizarre combination of illegal voters and bungling bureaucrats."

Democratic attorneys scoffed at the GOP claims, saying they lacked the clear and convincing proof needed to justify overturning the election. The election errors that Republicans characterized as "sinister," Democrats described as innocent mistakes that happen in every county, in every election.

"It's not enough to show a mistake, it's not enough to show a bad mistake, and it's not enough to show a really bad mistake," Democratic attorney Jenny Durkan said in her closing argument. "In order to prove their case, they still have to show that Gov. Gregoire did not receive the highest number of legal votes."

Sound Politics has followed the Washington state governors race since the first recount and is predicting that Judge Bridges will set aside the election.


Posted Monday June 6, 2005 | Catagory: (Elections) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
The Going $5 Rate Pays Voters in East St Louis
by Sandi

Keeping up with voter fraud, Daly Thoughts has more with Votes for sale in East St. Louis.
Posted Saturday June 4, 2005 | Catagory: (Elections) | Permalink
1 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
Wash: Disputed Governors Election Trial Continues
by Sandi

Report via SFGate

The Washington state disputed race for governor entered its second week with state director of elections Nick Handy testifying yesterday. Handy disputes that there was fraud saying that the election problems were innocent.

Attorneys for the GOP disagree and have presented evidence of illegal votes and other problems arguing that the election was stolen from Dino Rossi. Christine Gregoire won by 129 votes in a second recount.

"I saw inadvertent mistakes and errors of human beings who were working their hearts out," Handy said...

GOP attorney Dale Foreman challenged Handy's claim of impartiality Tuesday, pointing to a January e-mail in which Handy discussed how to discredit Republicans' claims that discrepancies could indicate fraud.

"If we can successfully demonstrate that this is an unfounded claim, I would hope that this would serve to undermine the confidence of the court in the other R claims," Handy wrote in the e-mail that Foreman submitted as evidence.

Handy said his office merely wants a "fair and impartial" hearing of the facts.

"How can you say that?" Foreman asked, his voice dripping with contempt. "You're under oath."

With the damning e-mail in evidence backing up GOP evidence of illegal votes, I presume that Handy will get his "fair and impartial" hearing of the facts.
Posted Wednesday June 1, 2005 | Catagory: (Elections) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
Seattle Washington: Judge Narrows GOP Options in Election Fraud Claims
by Sandi

Report via The Seattle Times

Yesterday the trial to settle the disputed Washington governor's election started. Republicans are claiming fraud and corruption robbed Dino Rossi of the governors office.

Judge John Bridges was quick to rein in such talk. He said fraud charges, which could make it easier for Republicans to get the November election thrown out, have not been part of the Republican case and can't simply be added now.

Bridges said he would allow Republicans to introduce evidence against King County, but as of now it won't be considered fraud in his courtroom. That matters because a fraud claim would not require Republicans to show that King County's actions specifically cost Rossi votes or gave Democrat Christine Gregoire her winning margin of 129 votes.

Without that, Republicans are required to show how actions by election workers, as well as illegal votes by felons and others, directly affected the candidates' vote totals.

For indepth coverage and updates visit Sound Politics.
Posted Tuesday May 24, 2005 | Catagory: (Elections) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
Walkers WI Voter-ID Proposal Without the Fluff
by Sandi

Republican candidate for governor Scott Walker has a comon sense plan for a Wisconsin Voter Photo ID.
•Photo identification requirement to vote (Wisconsin drivers license or state issued identification card).
•End to same day voter registration (so duplicate voters will be found and so felons can be purged from poll lists in advance of Election Day).
•Return to previous system of absentee ballot process where voters must be have reason to vote absentee (travel, health, etc.) so that municipal staff are not overwhelmed before Election Day with early voting.
•Prohibit voter registration drive organizers from paying for each signature collected by employees.
The system needs to be fixed, yet Govenor Doyle has twice used his veto to stop voter ID in spite of more than 83 percent of Wisconsin residents in favor of it.

This plan will disenfranchise felons, out of state voters, dead people, and those who attempt to vote a second time.
Posted Tuesday May 17, 2005 | Catagory: (Elections) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
Probe Finds Voter Fraud in Milwaukee
by Sandi

Many of my liberal friends have been down-playing the Milwaukee vote fraud investigation, some of them even calling it just a Republican plot to disenfranchise voters.

While the investigation is still ongoing, they reported today that they found clear evidence of voter fraud, mostly in Milwaukee. More than 200 cases involved felons voting illegally. Also more than 100 people voted twice, used fake names or false addresses, or voted in the name of dead people.

Officials said charges will be filed in coming weeks, as individual cases are reviewed and more evidence is gathered.

Nonetheless, it is likely that many - perhaps most - of those who committed fraud won't face prosecution because city records are so sloppy that a case cannot be established against them that will stand up in court.

U.S. Attorney Steve Biskupic likened it to trying to prove "a bank embezzlement if the bank cannot tell how much money was there in the first place."

A lot of the Journal Sentinel article is a rehash of their findings earlier in the year like the 7,000-vote gap with more votes counted than people tallied in log books. Statewide 278 felons voted, though most of them came from Milwaukee. Of some 70,000 same-day registration cards, 1,300 were allowed to vote in spite of the fact that many were missing addresses and even names.

They can't even be looking at them if the person's name is missing. If I'm not mistaken the poll workers have to initial them, if not they should. Those people should never be allowed to work at a polling place again.

Some of the findings of the investigation.

Biskupic said the investigation had found more than 200 felons who voted illegally in the city, echoing the newspaper's findings. He also said that effort had been expanded to include the suburbs...

In some cases, non-residents used non-existent city addresses to vote in Milwaukee. Officials are checking to see if they also voted elsewhere, such as their actual address.

In other cases, voters used names of dead people or "identities and addresses that cannot in any way be linked to a real person," Biskupic and McCann said in a summary of their findings.

A state legislative task force is also reviewing findings for possible reforms. More complete coverage of this story will be in Wednesdays Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. This blog will have a follow up with more details.
Posted Tuesday May 10, 2005 | Catagory: (Elections) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
Democrats Sue Over Indiana Voter ID Law
by Sandi

Here we go again, another state with the Democrats crying foul and disenfranchisement for having to prove you are who you say you are.

Critics say requiring a photo ID at the polls unfairly affects the poor, minorities, people with disabilities and the elderly, many of whom do not have driver's licenses and might struggle to obtain a photo ID.

The opposition excuses are so lame I don't know how they can keep repeating them with a straight face.

Update: More at Daly Thoughts.

Posted Tuesday May 3, 2005 | Catagory: (Elections) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
GOP Analysis Gives Rossi 100-Vote Win
by Sandi

Washington state Democratic Governor Christine Gregorie would have lost last November by about 100 votes had not ballots cast by felons, dead voters, and non-citizens allowed Gregoire a small 129 vote win.

But it's not clear whether the courts will buy into the statistical arguement. Democrats contend that state law doesn't allow such arguements.

Huh? WTF! If those arguements are not good enough then nothing is.

Republicans intend to file findings of the statictical analysis in the election trial that starts May 23 in Superior Court. The findings include the following allegations of improper votes in the election:

• 946 ballots cast by felons, who are barred from voting by the state constitution unless their civil rights have been restored. Of those, 726 came from King County.

• 53 ballots cast in the names of dead voters, including 39 in King County.

• 22 ballots from voters who voted twice in Washington state, and five from voters who voted in Washington and another state.

• Two absentee ballots from Chehalis that were filled out by someone other than the registered voter who received them.

• Two ballots from Seattle cast by non-citizens, who are ineligible to vote.

• 317 provisional ballots that were tabulated without the required verification of voter status. All but a handful are from King County.

But Democrats in Washington don't want to reign in illegal voting, they want to expand it. As this post from Sound Politics shows they are "Advocates for illegal voting."

Q: Can non-citizens vote in our elections?

A: Although that has not been proven to have been a problem in the last election, within these reforms we are requiring that clear and conspicuous language be added to the voter registration form stating that the applicant must be a U.S. citizen and a check box confirming that the applicant is a citizen. Additionally there will be a warning put on the voter registration form that it is a class C felony to provide false information.

There is no database to cross-reference voter rolls and check for U.S. citizenship. We must rely on law enforcement to prosecute individuals who lie on their registration. In our efforts to better our election process, we must not disenfranchise potential voters who are given the right to vote by our constitution. In protecting some we cannot create barriers for others.

Just who else do the Democrats think preventing non-citizens from voting creates barrier for?

Michelle Malkin also reports on Counting Every (bogus) Vote.

Posted Wednesday April 20, 2005 | Catagory: (Elections) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
Milwaukee: Voter Logbooks Out of Whack
by Sandi
Reported in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Febuary 9

There is really nothing new here but I supply the link for anyone that wants every detail that developes. I will post more extensively when there are new facts coming to light.
Posted Thursday February 10, 2005 | Catagory: (Elections) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
GOP Consultant Sentenced in Phone Jamming
by Sandi

Reported in Newsday.com Febuary 8


Allen Raymond, former head of a consulting group for the Republicans was sentenced Tuesday to five months jail time for jamming Democratic telephone lines in some New Hampshire cities for the 2002 mid-term election.
He had pleaded guilty in June.

Court papers say Raymond and co-conspirators plotted to jam Democratic lines that voters could call for rides to the polls in Manchester, Nashua, Rochester and Claremont. A line run by the nonpartisan Manchester firefighters' union also was jammed.
Hat tip: The American Mind.
Posted Tuesday February 8, 2005 | Catagory: (Elections) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
Restoring Faith In Our Elections
by Sandi
Report via the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Febuary 5

Hat tip to Patrick at My View of the World.

Following Milwaukee's bungled election last November there has been a flurry of blogging activity with the help of the Journal Sentinel on the need to reestablish credibility to Wisconsin's voting requirements.

There have been 7,000 unaccounted votes in Milwaukee and more than 1,200 votes recorded from invalid addresses. In the city, 277,535 ballots were cast. But election records show only 269,212 people as having voted, a difference of about 8,300.

Rep. Jeff Stone and Sen. Joe Leibham have recently re-introduced legislation requiring a Photo ID for voters. A similar bill was vetoed in August 2003 by Governor Jim Doyle. Doyle has promised to veto it again this year.

Democratic opposition to the Stone-Leibham bill has been substantial but the excuses lame and endless.
The line taken by many Democrats and their allies now is: It all could have been human error, so it's just creepy Republicanism to worry.

"I don't see any large-scale violation of voting laws," said Rep. Robert Turner of Racine.

"Fraudulent Republican claims," brayed one Milwaukee poll-watcher in an essay in a Madison newspaper, saying it was all a plot hinging on faulty voting machines.

It's all about "harassment and disenfranchisement," huffed a Racine newspaper editorialist.

A little scenario: It's 3 a.m. The smoke detector wakes you. It could be your 19-year-old making pizza. Do you assume this, pull the battery and go back to bed?

Faith in the vote is important. But insisting that gaps in the count can't be anything but error, unworthy of investigation, does not cultivate that faith.

And insisting it's oppressive to ask people to better identify themselves as legitimate voters leaves one in doubt that Democrats really want to clear up the smoke.

A wary watch on procedure is part of Wisconsin's governmental genes. Municipal races are non-partisan, lest loyalty trump service. We have open records laws not because we assume officials are doing wrong but to keep us from having to suspect it.

The bill that would require voters to show identification with a picture at the polls is in this tradition.

Identity is intrinsic to voting. Where and whether you can vote is a function of who you are: your age, your residency, whether you've already been through the line.

In the November vote, these questions were found to be unanswerable for perhaps thousands of people, even now, months later. Reasonable observers have noted that Wisconsin's practice of letting anyone vote on the mere say-so of another voter - such is the present law - opens an unguarded door for anyone who puts winning ahead of honesty. We seldom leave such doors open in our government. By not closing it here, we have left election officials vulnerable to legitimate suspicion, and we taint the legitimacy of all voters.
The photo ID isn't a cure-all, but it would certainly be a big step in the right direction. Yet the Democrats cry that Rebublicans want to disenfranchise voters, that it is important that everyone be able to vote without hindrances of any kind.

JS reported on the a meeting with Lawmakers a few days ago and that Karla Smith of Madison, who uses a wheelchair, told lawmakers that the measure would disenfranchise disabled people, because they would have trouble lining up transportation to get an ID.

Kevin at Lakeshore Laments has done some background on Ms Smith and theorizes why she was at the meeting despite supposed lack of transportation.
Might this be the reason, Ms. Smith, that you're there? A quick Google Search of "Karla Smith Madison" finds this little gem.
Karla Smith
Karla Smith is currently an employment counselor at Access to Independence, an independent living service located in Madison.

When she was 30 years old, Karla's health condition forced her to live in a nursing home, where she was told she would be for the rest of her life. Through determination, effort, and persistence, and by utilizing state resources, Karla was able to leave the nursing home. Once independent, she involved herself in extensive volunteer activities, for which she received national recognition. She feared finding employment because she thought she would lose her medical assistance, but she did find fulfilling employment helping others to live independently. In her words, "I want to reach out to these people and say, "Don't give up. There is hope. You just gotta take it a little bit at a time. Don't give up."
That's off the state's site for "Wisconsin Pathways to Independence," which is on the website for the Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services. Access to Independence is a non-profit group based in Madison that receives taxpayer grants.
The left wants this to go away, but the Wisconsin bloggers are not going to let it die until meaningful steps have been taken to return faith and credibility to the states voting system. And if I may use Ms Smiths words and turn them back at her; "There is hope. You just gotta take it a little bit at a time. Don't give up."
Posted Sunday February 6, 2005 | Catagory: (Elections) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
Lawmakers Hear From Voters On Both Sides Of Debate
by Sandi

Report via the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Febuary 3

The state photo ID in the form of a Wisconsin drivers license that residents carry is either the key to restoring faith in the electoral system, or a method for preventing thousands from voting—at least that is what the debate in the Capitol centered around Thursday.
The hearing came in the aftermath of stories by the Journal Sentinel highlighting major voting irregularities that occurred in Milwaukee during the Nov. 2 presidential election. Among the problems that have surfaced are 1,200 votes cast from invalid addresses; 1,300 same-day voter registration cards that can't be processed; and 17 wards where 100 or more votes were recorded than people who city records show voted there.
Last Monday the Republican-controlled Legislature re-introduced a bill similar to the one that Democratic Governor Jim Doyle vetoed in 2003 that would require voters to show a valid photo ID to register and vote. But the bill would change Wisconsin's historic open election process, that allows voting by providing just their name and address. Also registration on election day is permitted with just a piece of mail as proof of residence.
Under the new measure, those casting absentee ballots would be required to send a copy of their photo IDs with their ballots. People who regularly vote by absentee ballot - such as senior citizens or people with disabilities who don't have photo IDs - could instead have a witness verify their identities.

Most people would show a driver's license to vote, but a state-issued identification card or military ID would also be accepted. The state would offer free IDs to those who don't have them or can't afford them, under the bill.

The proposed legislation would also eliminate the practice of "vouching," which allows eligible voters to cast a ballot if another person can confirm their identity and address.
The range of reasons for opposition to voter ID's varries widely, yet most seem easily addressable.
But opponents warned that asking thousands of elderly and low-income residents who don't have photo IDs to obtain them is an undue burden.
Do these people never cash a check? And if they don't have checking do they never rent a movie?
Karla Smith of Madison, who uses a wheelchair, told lawmakers that the measure would disenfranchise disabled people, because they would have trouble lining up transportation to get an ID.
So take a little extra effort to line up transportation, you have years to do it. Also assuming like a drivers license it would be good for 8 years if I am not mistaken. I would think it would be a modest burden if it would fix the broken system we have now.
Rep. Joe Parisi (D-Madison), the former Dane County clerk, said getting rid of the vouching system would make it virtually impossible for homeless people to vote.
I fail to see why a homeless person can't get a free ID with a social worker vouching for them.

What ever name you want to put on the voting problems I do not want my vote deluted in the name of "open elections," that are also wide open to fraud. Is it asking so much to simply ask a voter to identify who they are?

Disenfranchised: A word used by some far left Democrats to describe voters who are:

Inelgible felons
Dead
Non-human
Illegal aliens
Already voted once
Posted Friday February 4, 2005 | Catagory: (Elections) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
MIlwaukee: Voter Irregularities Off The Chart
by Sandi

Report via the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Febuary 1

17 wards have at least 100 more votes than voters; 2 miss by over 500


Greg Borowski at the JS is doing great keeping on top of the voting irregularities in Milwaukee. The rest of the MSM doesn't seem interested in the story that has been growing and smelling more of fraud every week.

In 17 wards there was a minimum of and often more than 100 more votes recored than people listed as having voted there. The record keeping is totally flawed, it makes getting any sense out of the records almost impossible. In two wards the gap was more than 500.
Such gaps were present at different levels in nearly all of the city wards and could hamper the investigation launched last week by federal and local authorities into possible voter fraud by giving an incomplete or inaccurate picture of who actually voted.

They also raise questions about the level of oversight of how the city records who voted in each ward - an important safeguard that, properly done, can be used to spot double voting and other problems.
Mayor Tom Barrett elected last April has taken repsonsibility and promises to clean up the problems and overhaul the system.
Barrett, elected last April, said "there were problems in the department before we got here," but added: "I accept the responsibility (for the problems)."

All together, the Journal Sentinel has found a gap of about 7,000 votes that are unaccounted for. That is based on a difference between the 277,535 ballots cast in Milwaukee and the 269,212 people listed as voting in the city's computer system.

While that leaves a difference of about 8,300, at least 1,300 of that number would represent same-day registration cards that could not be processed for reasons ranging from missing addresses and names to addresses that are outside the city.

"I don't think we have seen any evidence of fraud," Barrett said. But he acknowledged that vote gaps and other problems shake the confidence of residents and others in the system.
There is also a state audit underway and last Monday Republicans introduced legislation requiring voter ID's for Wisconsin voters.
Meanwhile, a state audit into election problems in Milwaukee, a probe that will include other communities statewide, could get formal approval today. And on Monday, Republicans in Madison renewed a push - which failed two years ago - to require all voters to show photo identification.

On Tuesday, Rick Graber, head of the state Republican Party, challenged his Democratic counterpart to appear at a hearing on the matter Thursday so together they can condemn "the fact that potentially thousands of voters across Wisconsin had their legally cast ballot disenfranchised by fraud and abuse."

Linda Honold, state Democratic Party chair, said she was unsure if she would attend the meeting but added that if she did go, she would do so to oppose the bill.

"If I'm there, I'm not going to be arguing what he wants me to argue," she said.

Others, including the head of the American Civil Liberties Union of Wisconsin and the group Wisconsin Citizen Action, condemned the voter ID proposal.

"The way to prevent fraud is more and better poll workers," said Larry Marx, co-executive director of Wisconsin Citizen Action. "We want to make it easier to vote and harder to cheat. The photo ID bill makes it harder to vote and harder to cheat."
The voter ID opposition is so transparent it is hard to see how they can voice their objections with a straight face. Most people drive to the polls, and the legislation makes other ID provisions for elderly and others that do not drive. Good Lord you can't even rent a movie without a valid ID.

As he has from the beginning Captain Ed at Captain's Quarters is keeping up with the story and has good critique.

Posted Wednesday February 2, 2005 | Catagory: (Elections) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
Wisconsin Voter ID Gets New Push
by Sandi
After recent voter registration irregularities in Milwaukee, lawmakers on Monday introduced a bill that would require voters to present a photo ID at the polls. After passing the state house and senate last year it was vetoed by Governor Doyle. Doyle has promised to veto it again when it comes up.
The voter ID legislation, which Rep. Jeff Stone (R-Greendale) and Sen. Joe Leibham (R-Sheboygan) introduced, is similar to a bill that Gov. Jim Doyle vetoed in 2003. The two lawmakers said the measure is a "reasonable and sensible" approach to correcting some of the problems that emerged in Milwaukee and that rattle residents' faith in the system.

Stone and Leibham said the new version of the legislation also addresses some of the potential obstacles that opponents fear would limit someone's ability to vote.

"Anyone who is a legal resident in the state of Wisconsin can vote under this voter ID bill," Stone said.

Under current law, Wisconsin residents may vote by providing their names and addresses to poll workers, and they may register on election day by presenting proof of residence. That would change under the proposed legislation; a voter would be required to show a valid photo ID to vote and register. If the address on the ID didn't match the voter's current address, documentation of the new address would be allowed.

Those casting absentee ballots would be required to send a copy of their photo IDs with their ballots. Seniors or people with disabilities who don't have photo IDs could have a witness verify their identities.

The legislation also would eliminate the state's "vouching" system, which allows someone to have another person at the polls guarantee his or her identity and address. Lawmakers said the practice had been abused.

In a statement, the state Republican Party advocated going even further - by ending Wisconsin's same-day registration system. Party Chairman Rick Graber said the system "leaves our system wide open to fraud."
Most of the arguments against voter ID are so disingenuous that they are insulting but it doesn't keep the opposition from touting them, or trying to scare the poor and elderly with words like "disenfranchise."
Posted Wednesday February 2, 2005 | Catagory: (Elections) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
Milwaukee: Update on Voter Registration Problems
by Sandi


With the Iraqi election coverage among other pressing matters I have neglected to keep up to date on Wisconsin's voter registration investigation. So to catch up there were two Milwaukee Journal Sentinel articles Saturday.

One was by By Greg Borowski who has been doing a good job staying on top of the story. It is pretty much a recap of the ongoing investigations, and a couple examples of growing mistrust from Milwaukee area voters. Nothing really new so I won't go into it further.

The other article is by Jim Stingl and is a pretty poor piece of journalism filled with snearing partisan jibs and misstatements. Stingl took the list of unverified voters and found a few of the people through transposed numbers, or mislabed streets (i.e. road instead of court).
I was just chatting with one of those shadowy voters from the fabled land of invalid addresses.

Johann Hauser-Ulrich was the very first name on the list of more than 1,200 Milwaukee voters who may or may not be up to something sinister, like voting for Democrats.

It wasn't hard to find him. I just went to the address listed, 1335 N. King Drive. The place is an aquarium store, which struck me as fishy. But Hauser-Ulrich, 20, has lived upstairs since moving here from Minneapolis in September to attend UWM.

[...]

Although I lack arrest or subpoena power, I launched my own investigation last week that involved tracking down these frauds and realizing what nice, honest people most of them seemed to be.

The other thing that became quickly obvious is that the Milwaukee Election Commission can't keep its numbers straight.

Most voters are not lost; the digits in their addresses are just transposed or messed up in some other creative way.

Using a highly sophisticated voter address cross-checker - OK, the Milwaukee phonebook - I quickly deduced that the no-good cheat at, say, non-existent 5305 W. Whatever St., actually lives at 5365.

So I guess we should hold off a bit on slapping handcuffs on people like this.

And the commission hasn't quite figured out the difference between Blue Mound Road and Blue Mound Court. You'd think from looking at the dreaded list of invalid addresses that the Blue Mound cabal just north of Miller Park is trying to bring down democracy.

"You mean I'm one of the fraudulent voters? Oh, my God. I've been voting for years at this address," said Karen Heerhold, a retired county budget analyst, whom I found hiding in plain sight on Blue Mound Court.
While Stingl admittedly says, "I'll admit that I didn't locate every voter I looked for." Duh—no one said that there were not a few errors that could be traced down. But he blames the election commision for errors like transposed numbers, when it was the voter who wrote down the information. Further Stingl insinuates that because he was able to find a few voters that the majority of the list is also made up of good voters.

If Stingl can continue his work and find a majority of the voters on the remaining bad cards, I will write him a personal appology, other wise he is a partisan hack, and needs to put the jug down and step back.
Posted Monday January 31, 2005 | Catagory: (Elections) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks