Note: Tabs under contruction - some not active.

Woman Lived in Bathroom for Two Years
by Sandi
Post Source: Yahoo News

Some may find this funny, and I suppose that in a way it is. However I have known people with real bad phobias, and no matter how illogical their fears may appear to us, they are very real to them. The only way they can lead a normal life if to face those fears, with professional help if they can't handle it alone.

WICHITA, Kan. - A 35-year-old woman who sat on her boyfriend's toilet for so long that her body was stuck to the seat by the time he called police had a phobia about leaving the bathroom, the boyfriend said.

"She is an adult; she made her own decision," said her boyfriend, Kory McFarren. "I should have gotten help for her sooner; I admit that. But after a while, you kind of get used to it."

The case drew nationwide attention after Ness County Sheriff Bryan Whipple said it appeared the Ness City woman's skin had grown around the seat in the two years she apparently was in the bathroom.

"We pried the toilet seat off with a pry bar and the seat went with her to the hospital," Whipple said. "The hospital removed it."

McFarren, 36, said he can't be certain how long Pam Babcock stayed in the bathroom because "time just went by so quick I can't pinpoint how long." He said beatings she received in her childhood caused her phobia.

"It just kind of happened one day; she went in and had been in there a little while, the next time it was a little longer. Then she got it in her head she was going to stay — like it was a safe place for her," McFarren said.

But McFarren said she moved around in the bathroom during that time, bathed and changed into the clothes he brought her. He brought food and water to her. They had conversations and had an otherwise normal relationship — except it all happened in the bathroom.

I don't think McFarren was being truthful about her moving around in the bathroom either. If she had been she wouldn't have been stuck to the toilet seat to the extent her skin had grown around it.

Not that McFarren forced her to stay there, but I'm sure that she was afraid to leave her "safe" area. She could have been afraid of people visiting the house, or maybe some of McFarrens friends visited now and then, and the bathroom is the only place you are not likely to be bothered.

Via Boots & Sabers

Posted Thursday March 13, 2008 | Catagory: (Health/Medicine) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
Singing Starlings: Boys Who Should have been girls
by Sandi
Post Source: Daily Mail (UK)

What is their connection?

Chemicals that contaminate our food, water, environment and our bodies have been rising. Some of these chemicals are estrogen from birth control pills and hormone replacement therapy.

Scientists at Cardiff University have discovered that the brains of male starlings foraging for worms at a sewage treatment works in South-West England have been subtly changed by being contaminated by oestrogen from the contraceptive pill and hormone replacement therapy (HRT).

The female hormones - present in women's urine, and passing through the sewage treatment unaffected - caused the part of the brain that controls their song to grow much bigger, causing them to sing at greater length and with even more virtuosity than usual.

<...snip...>

Researchers at the University of California have found that feeding female finches with a hormone used in HRT has caused them to sing, something hitherto done only by their males.

But think again if you think this is only for the birds.

Studies in more than 20 countries have shown that average amounts [of male sperm] have fallen by well over half in the past 50 years, from an average of more than 150 million per millilitre to 66 million.

The result is that men are now less than half as fertile as hamsters.

The counts are continuing to plunge by two per cent a year, and no end to the decline is in sight. At this rate, the average man will be unable to father children within decades.

<...snip...>

And research at the University of Rochester in New York State has shown that the male children of women exposed to phthalates have smaller penises and other signs of feminisation of their genitals.

Communities exposed to high levels of these and other gender-bender chemicals, from the Great Lakes of North America to the Russian Arctic, have been found to give birth to twice as many girls as boys.

This may offer a clue to the cause of a mysterious shift in the sex of babies worldwide.

Conflict

Normally 106 boys are born for every 100 girls, in what is thought to be nature's way of compensating for the fact that males were more likely to be killed hunting or in conflict.

But increasingly this ratio is slipping - it is calculated that 250,000 babies who would have been boys have been born girls in the U.S. and Japan alone.

The saying that "you are what you eat" holds true... whether we know we are eating it matters not.

Posted Friday February 29, 2008 | Catagory: (Health/Medicine) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
Sight Restored With the Aid of Son's Tooth
by Sandi
Post Source: Brisbane Times (Australia)

Huh! *blink*

An Irishman blinded by an explosion two years ago has had his sight restored after doctors inserted his son's tooth in his eye, he said on Wednesday.

Bob McNichol, 57, from County Mayo in the west of the country, lost his sight in a freak accident when red-hot liquid aluminium exploded at a re-cycling business in November 2005.

The Ireland doctors told him there was nothing they could do, but he heard about a miracle operation being performed in England.

The procedure used on McNichol involved his son Robert, 23, donating a tooth, its root and part of the jaw.

McNichol's right eye socket was rebuilt, part of the tooth inserted and a lens inserted in a hole drilled in the tooth.

The first operation lasted ten hours and the second five hours.

"It is pretty heavy going," McNichol said. "There was a 65 percent chance of me getting any sight.

"Now I have enough sight for me to get around and I can watch television. I have come out from complete darkness to be able to do simple things," McNichol said.

Fascinating. He may not have the best sight, but being able to see at all has to be much better than total blindness.

Posted Thursday February 28, 2008 | Catagory: (Health/Medicine) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
WI Don't Need Gov't Managed Healthcare
by Sandi
 
Wisconsin presently has the best health care in the country. Doyle as well as many in Wisconsin state government want to change that. Why? Because they are not much interested in improving health care, only universal coverage. Simply saying that everyone has health insurance is meaningless if it isn't quality care. Making health care free (at least for lower income people) is worth many votes at election time.

If really you think universal coverage is good, look at the waiting lines in Canada. Britain has universal coverage too, but almost 900,000 are waiting for admission to NHS hospitals, with the shortage of care the cause of more that 50,000 operations canceled every year. Sweden has universal health care, but if you need heart surgery the wait can take as long as 25 weeks. Universal Health care is substandard health care in any country around the world that has implemented it.

A study published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2006 found that while many Americans were not getting a high standard of care, whether or not they had insurance was largely unrelated to the quality of care. Which do you think is less expensive, having the cost of treating the poor passed along to us in higher taxes, or the bureaucracy of government managed health care?

Wise up people. Universal health care does not mean universal access. Access to a list IS NOT access to health care. What universal health care access does mean is access to less quality health care, because that kind of care is rationed health care. Maybe while you wait you should consider how much chronic pain you can stand.

Please watch this five and a half minute video clip.


A Short Course in Brain Surgery



It seems that there should be something workable without resorting to government run health care which has been a proven failure. Retail clinics are springing up around the nation, and offering easier access to high-quality care at better prices than hospitals and affiliated clinics.

One of the most promising developments is the emergence of retail-based "convenient care" clinics that are providing consumers with easier access to high-quality, routine health care at affordable prices. There are about 400 such clinics today and could be several thousand more in the next few years, but their growth is being threatened by burdensome regulations in some states and opposition from some corners of organized medicine.

Convenient care clinics are small health-care facilities with new brand names like RediClinic, MinuteClinic, and Take Care Health Clinics. Most are located in high-traffic retail outlets with pharmacies, such as Wal-Mart, CVS and Walgreen stores. Regional health-care systems have also opened retail-based clinics in their service areas, either directly or in partnerships with independent operators. These clinics generally are staffed by certified nurse practitioners who diagnose, treat and prescribe medications for a limited set of common ailments, such as strep throat and ear infections. They also administer health screenings, medical tests, immunizations, basic physical exams and other preventive care.

Convenient care clinics have been embraced by consumers, who give them consistently high marks for patient satisfaction: 97% of the more than 4,000 RediClinic patients surveyed this year said they would recommend RediClinic to their relatives and friends. This is because the clinics are delivering something that is all too rare in our system — convenient and affordable health care.

The quality of care at convenient care clinics stems from their use of nationally certified nurse practitioners, who are registered nurses with master's degrees or comparable advanced training. Research over the past 30 years has consistently shown that the primary care provided by nurse practitioners is comparable in quality to that provided by physicians, though nurse practitioners are still required to collaborate with local physicians in most states.

Patients who have conditions that are outside of convenient care clinics' limited scope of practice, or who need ongoing care, are referred to local physicians, and nurse practitioners use evidence-based treatment protocols and electronic medical-record systems to standardize care and facilitate continuity of care when other clinicians are involved. According to a recent study conducted by the RAND Corporation, Americans receive evidence-based care only 55% of the time at conventional health-care delivery outlets. MinuteClinic's recent analysis of 58,000 sore-throat cases seen at their clinics showed that the diagnosis and treatment conformed to evidence-based guidelines 99.15% of the time.

Convenience is assured through the location of the sites and the fact that they are open seven days a week, including extended hours on weekdays. No appointments are necessary, and visits take only about 15 minutes due to the clinics' limited set of services. The clinics' location in stores with pharmacies provides additional convenience because patients can go across the aisle to get their prescriptions filled rather than having to make separate trips for this purpose.

The problem is that regulations on retail convenient care clinics varies state to state, and many states are trying to at least regulate if not eliminate them. Recently on this forum I posted about Boston Mayor Thomas M. Menino trying to block retailers from opening medical clinics inside stores in Massachusetts, contending that making money off of sick people is wrong. I have to wonder if he thinks doctors should work for gratis. The American Medical Association is pushing for government intervention to reduce the spread of retail convenient care clinics.

I guess I have ranted long enough on this, but it really bothers me that people do not understand the dangers of government managed health care.

Posted Monday January 21, 2008 | Catagory: (Health/Medicine) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
BMI Technology Can Be Operated By Thought
by Sandi
Post Source: Science Daily

BMI (brain-machine interface) has reached a new level, that could be great news for the severely handicapped people who cannot contract so much as one single leg or arm muscle.

Thanks to the rapid pace of research on the BMI, one day these and other individuals may be able to feed themselves with a robotic arm and hand that moves according to their mental commands.

"Our work has shown how important the learning process is when using brain-controlled devices," says Andrew Schwartz, PhD, of the University of Pittsburgh. "By permitting the subject to adaptively recode the generated neural activity, the overall performance of the device is dramatically increased.

"Furthermore, as we have progressed in this work, it has become apparent that the basic idea of 'intention' during learning is very important and can be addressed by the direct observation of the neuronal transformations taking place during this fundamental processing," Schwartz says.

<...snip...>

In the Pittsburgh lab's latest studies, macaque monkeys not only mentally guided a robotic arm to pieces of food but also opened and closed the robotic arm's hand, or gripper, to retrieve them. Just by thinking about picking up and bringing the fruit to its mouth, the animal fed itself.

The monkey's own arm and hand did not move while it manipulated the two-finger gripper at the end of the robotic arm. The animal used its own sight for feedback about the accuracy of the robotic arm's actions as it mentally moved the gripper to within one-half centimeter of a piece of fruit.

<...snip...

The animal's thoughts emitted electrical signals that were recorded by tiny electrodes that the scientists had implanted in the monkey's motor cortex. A computer-decoding algorithm translated the signals into the robotic arm and gripper's movements.>

Great news for paralyzed people and amputees.

Read the rest here. Via Kurzweil.AI

Posted Wednesday November 14, 2007 | Catagory: (Health/Medicine) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
Bionic Nerve Helps Regenerate Damaged Limbs
by Sandi

Breakthroughs in medical science are seemingly becoming a daily occurrence. If this one is as good as it looks, it will end a lot of suffering and loss of mobility.

In a study published in October's Experimental Neurology, Dr Paul Kingham and his team at the UK Centre for Tissue Regeneration (UKCTR) isolated the stem cells from the fat tissue of adult animals and differentiated them into nerve cells to be used for repair and regeneration of injured nerves. They are now about to start a trial extracting stem cells from fat tissue of volunteer adult patients, in order to compare in the laboratory human and animal stem cells.

Following that, they will develop an artificial nerve constructed from a biodegradable polymer to transplant the differentiated stem cells. The biomaterial will be rolled up into a tube-like structure and inserted between the two ends of the cut nerve so that the regrowing nerve fibre can go through it from one end to the other.

This 'bionic' nerve could also be used in people who have suffered trauma injuries to their limbs or organs, cancer patients whose tumour surgery has affected a nearby nerve trunk and people who have had organ transplants.

With a clinical trial on the biomaterial about to be completed, the researchers hope the treatment could be ready for use in four or five years.

Dr Kingham said: "The differentiated stem cells have great potential for future clinical use, initially for treatment of patients with traumatic injuries of nerves in the arms and legs.

"This work will also help to develop a similar surgical approach for organ transplant, to give full functional recuperation to the transplanted tissue.

Via Kurzweil.AI

Posted Wednesday October 24, 2007 | Catagory: (Health/Medicine) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
End Employer Insurance?
by Sandi

I'm far from being a supporter of Government run health insurance, nor do I think most Americans want it. But if we have to go down that road, this is probably the best plan I have seen.

The Committee for Economic Development proposes replacing the current system with one that would provide universal coverage and remake the way health insurance is bought and sold.

"What we need is not to tinker at the edges," said Robert Chess, co-chair of the group's subcommittee on health care and chairman of Nektar Therapeutics, a drug-delivery company based in San Carlos, Calif. "We need to look at a fundamentally different solution."

There are key similarities to the Healthy Wisconsin proposal but with less government involvement.

• Establish a system of mandatory coverage in which people would receive a fixed-dollar credit from the government to buy health insurance from a menu of approved health plans. People could buy a more expensive plan by paying the extra cost.

• Prohibit insurance companies from setting rates based on age or pre-existing medical conditions. The "fine print" in the plans also would be standardized to protect consumers.

• Finance the new system through payroll taxes or other taxes.

There also are significant differences in the proposals.

Healthy Wisconsin included an option in which the state would set up a plan similar to Medicare.

The Committee for Economic Development, in contrast, contends that a single-payer, or "Medicare for all," plan run by the government would not work.

....

The Committee for Economic Development came to the same conclusion. But the group also said that merely expanding coverage under the current system would not solve the core problem: the unsustainable rise in health care costs.

At the same time, the report was critical of the contention that high-deductible health plans combined with health savings accounts - commonly called consumer-driven health care - will solve the problems facing the health care system.

....

Giving people incentives to choose less-expensive health plans could prod health plans to contract with hospitals and doctors that offer the best combination of price and quality.

"We are not letting market forces do their job now in the way they do in every other industry," said Chess, the co-chair of the group's subcommittee on health care.

The group's report notes that the health care market doesn't work to close the large gaps between the most efficient providers of health care and the inefficient ones, something that takes place in the rest of the economy.

I don't know that this is the answer, but it is a better proposal than I have seen to date.

H/T to Owen at Boots & Sabers who sees the proposal as "big business" wanting off the hook to reduce expenses that they often have to pass on to employees.


Posted Monday October 22, 2007 | Catagory: (Health/Medicine) | Permalink
1 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
Bush Veto on Kids' Health Plan
by Sandi
Source: USA Today

Today the President used his veto on the SCHIP (State Children's Health Insurance Program) legislation. Bush had asked for an additional $5 billion in funding for the program. The bill presented increased funding by $35 billion and included an additional 4 million children. The problem is that the legislation would allow insurance coverage to some families with an income as high as $83,000 annually. Some of the cost for the extra funding was to come from a $0.61 tax increase to $1 a pack tax on cigarettes.

Bush, who wanted a $5 billion increase, told Lancaster-area business leaders that he would offer more money if Congress agrees to focus the program strictly on low-income children.

"Poor kids first," Bush said. "I believe in private medicine, not the federal government running the health care system."

In a message to Congress, Bush wrote that the government's role should be to promote private coverage, "not to move children who already have private health insurance to government coverage."

On Capitol Hill, lawmakers from both parties bemoaned Bush's veto and vowed to work together to bypass him. "If we're truly compassionate, it seems to me we will want to endorse this program," said Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah.

Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, accused the White House of not working with Congress. "Every effort was made to bring them in," he said. "I think they decided to veto the bill before it was written."

It is just isn't right to include insurance coverage for children from upper middle-class families. Poor families will be paying more taxes to cover children from more wealthy families.

Hell if that is going to make sense, then it would make sense to extend welfare and food stamps to upper middle-class families too. After all, food and a place to live are more important than health insurance, and any emergency treatment cannot be refused anyone including illegal immigrants. [/Sarcasm]

I will concede that health insurance for poor children is a good thing, but we don't need to extend it to families that can afford their own.

Posted Wednesday October 3, 2007 | Catagory: (Health/Medicine, Politics) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
Edwards Health Care: Preventative Care Mandatory
by Sandi
Source: Yahoo News

Socialized health care is one thing. Health care with mandatory preventative checkups is getting a little too socialist, and far afield of free choice.

TIPTON, Iowa - Democratic presidential hopeful John Edwards said on Sunday that his universal health care proposal would require that Americans go to the doctor for preventive care.

"It requires that everybody be covered. It requires that everybody get preventive care," he told a crowd sitting in lawn chairs in front of the Cedar County Courthouse. "If you are going to be in the system, you can't choose not to go to the doctor for 20 years. You have to go in and be checked and make sure that you are OK."

He noted, for example, that women would be required to have regular mammograms in an effort to find and treat "the first trace of problem." Edwards and his wife, Elizabeth, announced earlier this year that her breast cancer had returned and spread.

Edwards said his mandatory health care plan would cover preventive, chronic and long-term health care. The plan would include mental health care as well as dental and vision coverage for all Americans.

"The whole idea is a continuum of care, basically from birth to death," he said.

So, do you suppose under Edwards plan we would all have to have a mental fitness checkup? Most of us have pretty good idea how fickle the field of psychiatry can be.

Posted Tuesday September 4, 2007 | Catagory: (Health/Medicine) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
Wisconsin Attempts to Socialize Health Care
by Sandi

Based on information compiled by the federal Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Wisconsin ranks number one in the nation. As I reported early in July, the Wisconsin Democrats want to change that. Wisconsin's Democrat controlled Senate wants to raise our taxes by $15 billion (more than we raise from corporate income taxes, sales taxes and income taxes combined) to pay for this experiment of a totally government-run health care system.

When Louis Brandeis praised the 50 states as "laboratories of democracy," he didn't claim that every policy experiment would work. So we hope the eyes of America will turn to Wisconsin, and the effort by Madison Democrats to make that "progressive" state a petri dish for government-run health care.

This exercise is especially instructive, because it reveals where the "single-payer," universal coverage folks end up. Democrats who run the Wisconsin Senate have dropped the Washington pretense of incremental health-care reform and moved directly to passing a plan to insure every resident under the age of 65 in the state. And, wow, is "free" health care expensive. The plan would cost an estimated $15.2 billion, or $3 billion more than the state currently collects in all income, sales and corporate income taxes. It represents an average of $510 a month in higher taxes for every Wisconsin worker.

Employees and businesses would pay for the plan by sharing the cost of a new 14.5% employment tax on wages. Wisconsin businesses would have to compete with out-of-state businesses and foreign rivals while shouldering a 29.8% combined federal-state payroll tax, nearly double the 15.3% payroll tax paid by non-Wisconsin firms for Social Security and Medicare combined.

This employment tax is on top of the $1 billion grab bag of other levies that Democratic Governor Jim Doyle proposed and the tax-happy Senate has also approved, including a $1.25 a pack increase in the cigarette tax, a 10% hike in the corporate tax, and new fees on cars, trucks, hospitals, real estate transactions, oil companies and dry cleaners. In all, the tax burden in the Badger state could rise to 20% of family income, which is slightly more than the average federal tax burden. "At least federal taxes pay for an Army and Navy," quips R.J. Pirlot of the Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce business lobby.

As if that's not enough, the health plan includes a tax escalator clause allowing an additional 1.5 percentage point payroll tax to finance higher outlays in the future. This could bring the payroll tax to 16%. One reason to expect costs to soar is that the state may become a mecca for the unemployed, uninsured and sick from all over North America. The legislation doesn't require that you have a job in Wisconsin to qualify, merely that you live in the state for at least 12 months. Cheesehead nation could expect to attract health-care free-riders while losing productive workers who leave for less-taxing climes.

This is giving to you with one hand, while taking much more from you with the other hand. Also Wisconsin Senate Democrats want to:

Create the first child care tax deduction in state history, but increase birth certificates fees; double fees to pay child support; create a new fee for those receiving child support.

End the tax on job creation in this state, but make it more expensive to drive to work with a $270 million tax on oil companies that you pay at the pump.

Increase the tax deduction for higher education, but while increasing tuition.

Make all social security 100-percent tax free, while raising property taxes. The median home will be up $400 in this budget cycle, due to a governor Doyle veto.

Related Posts (on one page):

  1. Wisconsin Attempts to Socialize Health Care
  2. Will Wisconsin Stay On Top of the Healthcare Heap?
Posted Tuesday July 24, 2007 | Catagory: (Health/Medicine, Taxes) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks