Skinning: Wordpress • Invision • Expression Engine • phpBB3
Quick & Easy Barcode Disease Diagnosis
by Sandi

Tired of all those medical tests to find out what your suffering from? Often they inconclusive requiring more tests, or wrong a diagnosis. Well all that may soon change as tests are on the way that can very quickly detect tiny amounts of protein in blood, or other body fluids, that indicate diseases, and display them barcode fashion.

"It's simple, very fast… and you have a system that is six orders of magnitude more sensitive than anything out there," Mirkin explains. "It is going to provide many opportunities in terms of developing new tests for new diseases, and creating tests that allow us to follow and treat existing diseases in a much more efficient manner." ...

As reported in Discover magazine, they created tiny gold nano-particles — hundreds of thousands of time smaller than the width of a human hair. When the particles are released in a blood, urine, or saliva sample taken from a patient, the genetic material latches on to any disease proteins they find. Proteins, the building blocks of living things, can serve as fingerprints for diseases.

"The nano-particle is coded with many strands of DNA which are identical, which are the barcodes," Mirkin explains. "When the nano-particle binds to the protein target of interest, it releases these mini barcodes for every protein molecule that is in solution, so that you're getting amplification," allowing the researchers to easily scan for disease with currently available DNA detection techniques.

"We have a chip that has many different spots of DNA on it that are designed to recognize all of the possible barcodes that are in the mixture," Mirkin says. "It binds the right spot and provides a signal that can be easily read with a screener."

Interesting to say the least. Maybe being six orders of magnitude more sensitive than any current tests, I wonder if it can find the HIV virus that is so elusive now except by in vitro methods.

Quicktime video clip

Posted Tuesday November 22, 2005 | Catagory: (Health/Medicine, Science & Technology) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
The Cholesterol Myth
by Sandi
 
In the past couple of decades medical science has made some awesome breakthroughs, yet some of what is believed and touted as facts, even by doctors amounts to myth, hype or both. I think a quote by British biologist Thomas Huxley too often carries a sad truth: The great tragedy of Science-the slaying of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact

We have all heard the claims. Eat too much cholesterol or saturated fat and your blood cholesterol will rise to dangerous levels. It's bad for you isn't it? Wrong! At least according to Malcolm Kendrick, a medical doctor who has spent many years researching the causes of heart disease.

It has driven a widespread change in the type of food we are told to eat, and consequently the food that lines the supermarket shelves. Many people view bacon and eggs as a dangerous killer, butter is shunned, and a multi-billion pound industry has sprung up providing 'healthy' low-fat alternatives.

At the same time, millions of people are prescribed statins to lower cholesterol levels, and each new set of guidelines suggests that ever-more lowering of cholesterol is needed. When it comes to explaining what causes heart disease, the cholesterol hypothesis reigns supreme.

But as the US editor and critic HL Mencken put it, 'For every complicated problem there is a solution that is simple, direct, understandable and wrong.' This is how we might view the diet-heart hypothesis: just because it is dominant does not mean it is right, and just because it looks simple does not mean that it actually is.

You can read the article for yourself but here are some fact tidbits that are direct contradictions to the cholesterol hypothesis:

There's no connection whatsoever between cholesterol in food and cholesterol in blood. And we've known that all along.

In fact, no clinical trial on reducing saturated fat intake has ever shown a reduction in heart disease. Some have shown the exact opposite

[A] disturbing trial involving Finnish businessmen. In a 10-year follow-up to the original five-year trial, it was found that those men who continued to follow a low saturated fat diet were twice as likely to die of heart disease as those who didn't.

'The crucial test is the controlled, randomised trial. Eight such trials using diet as the only treatment has been performed but neither the number of fatal or non-fatal heart attacks was reduced.'

After the age of 50, the lower your cholesterol level is, the lower your life expectancy.

Perhaps even more important than this is the fact that a falling cholesterol level sharply increases the risk of dying of anything, including heart disease.


So to shorten the bogus cholesterol at risk argument. Nobody in modern society has a normal cholesterol level. Therefore we are all ill and must be treated.

More on cholesterol skepticism here.

Related Posts (on one page):

  1. Low Fat Diet Has No Effect. On Health Risk
  2. The Cholesterol Myth
Posted Sunday November 20, 2005 | Catagory: (Health/Medicine) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks