Report via My Way News Febuary 24
This is just too wierd but you can't make this stuff up.
An appeals court said a man can press a claim for emotional distress after learning a former lover had used his sperm to have a baby. But he can't claim theft, the ruling said, because the sperm were hers to keep.No I don't suppose that any guys would demand to have their sperm returned to them after oral sex, but if they have read this story, then they just might demand that their inamorata" swallow or spit."
The ruling Wednesday by the Illinois Appellate Court sends Dr. Richard O. Phillips' distress case back to trial court.
Phillips accuses Dr. Sharon Irons of a "calculated, profound personal betrayal" after their affair six years ago, saying she secretly kept semen after they had oral sex, then used it to get pregnant.
He said he didn't find out about the child for nearly two years, when Irons filed a paternity lawsuit. DNA tests confirmed Phillips was the father, the court papers state.
Phillips was ordered to pay about $800 a month in child support, said Irons' attorney, Enrico Mirabelli.
The judges backed the lower court decision to dismiss the fraud and theft claims, agreeing with Irons that she didn't steal the sperm.
"She asserts that when plaintiff 'delivered' his sperm, it was a gift - an absolute and irrevocable transfer of title to property from a donor to a donee," the decision said. "There was no agreement that the original deposit would be returned upon request."
Irons' attorney also said "Imagine how a child feels when your father says he feels emotionally damaged by your birth." Well probably about half as bad as the child would feel knowing how his mother got pregnant. Especially later when he grows up and hears the old disparaging saying about where they best part of his fathers sperm went.












Now I don't claim to be a connoisseur of art, or even close, but I know an eye sore when I see one. This definitely qualifies. At least no one paid for this work of (gasp) art by artists Christo and Jeanne-Claude. In fact they probably should have been charged to inflict this eye sore on the people. Andrea Peyser agrees in her New York Post article agrees.
Curious about other work by the artists and wanting to see if it was just my taste I did a google and found more on the artists. They mostly wrap things (buildings, bridges, coastlines etc) or surround things like islands. None of it was to my taste and I am willing to let anyone else appriciate art as they see fit. Far be it from me to insult someones sensibilities because they differe from my own.
The French used grapes, Russians fermented potatoes, Koreans put ginseng in their drink and Mexicans distilled cactus plants to make fiery tequila.