Yes I think so. Republicans seem to be much more effective as a deterrent to excess spending as a minority party, than in the majority where they push instead of pulling back. Dick Army has an excellent article in The Washington Post about where the Republicans went wrong.
Where did the revolution go astray? How did we go from the big ideas and vision of 1994 to the cheap political point-scoring on meaningless wedge issues of today -- from passing welfare reform and limited government to banning horsemeat and same-sex marriage?
The answer is simple: Republican lawmakers forgot the party's principles, became enamored with power and position, and began putting politics over policy. Now, the Democrats are reaping the rewards of our neglect -- and we have no one to blame but ourselves....
Now spending is out of control. Rather than rolling back government, we have a new $1.2 trillion Medicare prescription drug benefit, and non-defense discretionary spending is growing twice as fast as it had in the Clinton administration. Meanwhile, Social Security is collapsing while rogue nations are going nuclear and the Middle East is more combustible than ever. Yet Republican lawmakers have taken up such issues as flag burning, Terri Schiavo and same-sex marriage.
Until the Republicans decide represent the people instead of their own interest I welcome their demise. Not as a punishment, but rather because it is quite obvious to me, that they were much more effective as a deterrent against excess spending as a minority party than they are now holding majority power.
Dean's World also has a very good post along similar lines about an upcoming special on CNN tonight called "Broken Government."










