Note: Tabs under contruction - some not active.

The Clean Energy Scam
by Sandi
Post Source: Time

Vista
Click for larger
From rain forest into farming in the name of clean renewable energy. This is yet another example of why environmental science and the political policy don't mix. When they are not kept separate politics always guides the science. In this case valuable rain forests are being devastated in the name of clean energy (as shown in the image).

From his Cessna a mile above the southern Amazon, John Carter looks down on the destruction of the world's greatest ecological jewel. He watches men converting rain forest into cattle pastures and soybean fields with bulldozers and chains. He sees fires wiping out such gigantic swaths of jungle that scientists now debate the "savannization" of the Amazon. Brazil just announced that deforestation is on track to double this year; Carter, a Texas cowboy with all the subtlety of a chainsaw, says it's going to get worse fast. "It gives me goose bumps," says Carter, who founded a nonprofit to promote sustainable ranching on the Amazon frontier. "It's like witnessing a rape." ....

"You can't protect it. There's too much money to be made tearing it down," he says. "Out here on the frontier, you really see the market at work."

This land rush is being accelerated by an unlikely source: biofuels. An explosion in demand for farm-grown fuels has raised global crop prices to record highs, which is spurring a dramatic expansion of Brazilian agriculture, which is invading the Amazon at an increasingly alarming rate.

Propelled by mounting anxieties over soaring oil costs and climate change, biofuels have become the vanguard of the green-tech revolution, the trendy way for politicians and corporations to show they're serious about finding alternative sources of energy and in the process slowing global warming. The U.S. quintupled its production of ethanol--ethyl alcohol, a fuel distilled from plant matter--in the past decade, and Washington has just mandated another fivefold increase in renewable fuels over the next decade.

How ironic that the deforestation is being driven by clean energy environmentalists.

Posted Friday April 4, 2008 | Catagory: (Stupid Should Hurt) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
Waking Up Inside a Garbage Truck...
by Sandi
 
...with the compactor about to be activated.


That should be enough to make a person stop drinking, at least to excess.

William M. Bowen, 27, awoke about 6:30 a.m. Thursday to find that he was inside a commercial trash-collection truck filled with waste.

A Rumpke garbage truck driver had emptied a bin behind the Muncie Eye Center into his truck and was about to activate its trash compressor when he heard someone screaming.

"He looked up and this gentleman was standing out the top of our truck," said Larry Green, market safety supervisor for Rumpke.

Green said the only thing Bowen said to the driver who found him was that he was cold.

"This gentleman was extremely intoxicated," he said.


Apparently, and I'm guessing because he said he was cold, he crawled into the trash bin to stay warm. An intoxicated mind doesn't work rationally.

Posted Friday March 28, 2008 | Catagory: (Stupid Should Hurt) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
1995 Internet Prediction Worth a Chuckle
by Sandi
Post Source: Newsweek

Back in 1995 Clifford Stoll made some pretty pessimistic predictions for the future of the internet.

But today, I'm uneasy about this most trendy and oversold community. Visionaries see a future of telecommuting workers, interactive libraries and multimedia classrooms. They speak of electronic town meetings and virtual communities. Commerce and business will shift from offices and malls to networks and modems. And the freedom of digital networks will make government more democratic.

Baloney. Do our computer pundits lack all common sense? The truth in no online database will replace your daily newspaper, no CD-ROM can take the place of a competent teacher and no computer network will change the way government works. ....

What the Internet hucksters won't tell you is tht the Internet is one big ocean of unedited data, without any pretense of completeness. Lacking editors, reviewers or critics, the Internet has become a wasteland of unfiltered data. You don't know what to ignore and what's worth reading. ....

Then there's cyberbusiness. We're promised instant catalog shopping--just point and click for great deals. We'll order airline tickets over the network, make restaurant reservations and negotiate sales contracts.

However I do pretty much agree with his last paragraph. I spend a lot of time online and gotten to know a lot of people quite well. While I may consider some friend, even the closet online relationships are pretty cold when compared to life.

What's missing from this electronic wonderland? Human contact. Discount the fawning techno-burble about virtual communities. Computers and networks isolate us from one another. A network chat line is a limp substitute for meeting friends over coffee. No interactive multimedia display comes close to the excitement of a live concert. And who'd prefer cybersex to the real thing? While the Internet beckons brightly, seductively flashing an icon of knowledge-as-power, this nonplace lures us to surrender our time on earth. A poor substitute it is, this virtual reality where frustration is legion and where--in the holy names of Education and Progress--important aspects of human interactions are relentlessly devalued.

Via Dean Esmay

Posted Monday March 24, 2008 | Catagory: (Stupid Should Hurt) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
Woman Sues Casinos: Didn't Stop Her Gambling
by Sandi

So, what do you do when you gamble away your apartment, law practice, parents’ home, and owe the IRS $58,000? You sue the casinos for $20Million for not being responsible for you, and cutting you off.

But her gambling spun out of control: She said she would go days at a time at the tables, not eating or sleeping, brushing her teeth with disposable wipes so she didn't have to leave.

She says her losses totaled nearly $1 million.

Now she's chasing the longest of long shots: a $20 million racketeering lawsuit in federal court against six Atlantic City casinos and one in Las Vegas, claiming they had a duty to notice her compulsive gambling problem and cut her off.

conpulsive
Arelia Margarita Taveras filed a $20
million racketeering lawsuit in
federal court against six Atlantic
City casinos and one in Las Vegas,
claiming they had a duty to notice
her compulsive gambling problem and
cut her off.
They knew I was going for days without eating or sleeping," Taveras said. "I would pass out at the tables. They had a duty of care to me. Nobody in their right mind would gamble for four or five straight days without sleeping."

Experts say her case will be difficult to prove, but it provides an unusually detailed window into the life of a problem gambler.

"It's like crack, only gambling is worse than crack because it's mental," said Taveras, 37, a New Yorker who now lives in Minnesota. "It creeps up on you, the impulse. It's a sickness."

She lost her law practice, her apartment, her parents' home, and owes the IRS $58,000. She said she even considered swerving into oncoming traffic to kill herself. ....

"How are you supposed to know whether this was a woman who was just having a good time, or had money and was just lonely, as opposed to someone who couldn't control themselves?" he said.

Arnie Wexler, the former head of the Council on Compulsive Gambling of New Jersey, estimates there are 5 million problem gamblers in the United States, with 15 million at risk of becoming compulsive.

"Hers is not a rare case, believe me," said Wexler, who says he had a gambling problem. "This is the most powerful addiction you can have without putting something into your body. You remember your first big win, and you think `Hey, I can do this again; I can get it all back.'"

As a young lawyer, Taveras made a name for herself representing the families of victims of American Airlines Flight 587, which crashed in New York City's borough of Queens in November 2001, killing 265 people.

Why would the courts even hear a case like this? I think this is the generation that grew up a decade or two behind me (60s & 70s) and don’t have any concept of personal responsibility.

Posted Sunday March 9, 2008 | Catagory: (Stupid Should Hurt) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
Would You Like to be Led Around on a Leash?
by Sandi
 
Tasha Maltby doesn't mind, nor does she mind the weird stares.





"I am a pet, I generally act animal like and I lead a really easy life," she said.

"I don't cook or clean and I don't go anywhere without Dani. It might seem strange but it makes us both happy. It's my culture and my choice. It isn't hurting anyone."

Hmmm no cooking or cleaning? Nah! still too humiliating, not to mention the hassles.


Last month, with Miss Maltby on a leash as usual, the couple tried to board a bus at the bus station.

The driver, who was off duty, was standing near the door.

Mr Graves alleged: "He shoved me off the bus. He called us freaks and he called Tasha a dog.

"He said, 'We don't let freaks and dogs like you on'. ....

In a separate incident, police were called when the driver, who has not been named, refused to allow other passengers on board after the couple ignored his orders and sat down.

But according to a Reuters report, the bus firm Arriva has apologized.

Arriva would not comment on specifics but said it apologised if the couple felt they had been discriminated against. It added, however, that the driver was worried about safety and the company told Maltby to take the leash off in the future.

"We have spoken to the driver who has talked about health and safety," a spokesman said. "Should she be attached to a chain and something happens on the bus, that could be dangerous. All we are saying is that she is very welcome to use the buses but not when she is on her lead."

Well I guess different strokes and all of that...

H/T to Wicked Thoughts blog

Posted Thursday January 24, 2008 | Catagory: (Stupid Should Hurt) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
'Crack Tax' Protects Druggies
by Sandi
Post Source: New York Post

I just don't know what to say about this other that I'm shocked. Look I don't care what drugs adults do, but if your going to tax it, for gods sake make it legal first.

Spitzer, in his 2008-09 budget proposal unveiled Tuesday, said he wants to create a tax stamp for illegal drugs, similar to such stamps used for cigarettes, which he says would raise $13 million in the coming fiscal year and $17 million annually after that.

According to a memo explaining the eyebrow-raising proposal, "The bill contains a unique and strict secrecy requirement, preserving the confidentiality of any information obtained from a dealer."

Disclosure of the information in some cases would be allowed for a criminal or civil proceeding involving taxes.

But "the bill specifically provides that none of the information may be used against the dealer in any criminal proceeding [other than a tax crime] unless it has been obtained independently," the memo said.

Dubbing it the "crack tax," state Sen. Martin Golden, a Brooklyn Republican and former city cop, called Spitzer's plan "another pie-in-the-sky idea that really has no legitimacy, and hopefully is not a first step toward legalizing drugs."

The plan, modeled after one in North Carolina, would require arrested drug dealers or users to purchase different tax stamps from the state.

Tennessee enacted a similar provision that brought in nearly $2 million dollars. The tax is supposed to go towards fighting drugs, but the article fails to mention the success in that area.

What next? I have it, a bomb tax with a strict secrecy requirement, preserving the confidentiality of any information obtained from a terrorist.

Posted Thursday January 24, 2008 | Catagory: (Stupid Should Hurt) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
Go Outside and Swear
by Sandi
 
So say the ST. CHARLES, Mo City officials.

ST. CHARLES, Mo. - What the ...? A St. Louis-area town is considering a bill that would ban swearing in bars, along with table-dancing, drinking contests and profane music.

City officials contend the bill is needed to keep rowdy crowds under control because the historic downtown area gets a little too lively on some nights.

City Councilman Richard Veit said he was prompted to propose the bill after complaints about bad bar behavior. He says it will give police some rules to enforce when things get too rowdy.

If crowds get too lively and needing control, why not just arrest, and charge them with sane ordiances, like disturbing the peace or disorderly conduct?

WTF!? Excuse my skepticism, but I think most police officers hearing someone swear in a bar will think of this ordinance (assuming it would pass), chuckle and move on.

On a related note, this article reminded me of a video clip I saw recently.


Swear Jar


Posted Friday January 18, 2008 | Catagory: (Stupid Should Hurt) | Permalink
1 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
It's All Been a Big Fat Lie!
by Sandi
 
I agree with the Assistant Village Idiot who contends that dietitians are making us fat.

Posted Saturday December 29, 2007 | Catagory: (Stupid Should Hurt) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
Guys, Look Before You Leap Leak
by Sandi
 
This amusing article was posted on one of my forum haunts.

Kann Veasna took a break from drinking wine at a street stall to relieve himself through a hole in a fence, according to news agency DPA.

However a puppy spotted the Mr Veasna's appendage as it poked through and apparently thinking it was a toy latched on, newspaper Rasmei Kampuchea reported.

What an embarrassing story to have to tell the medical people. One would think that guys would be more careful where they stick their member.

Posted Wednesday December 19, 2007 | Catagory: (Stupid Should Hurt) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
Sorry We Ruined Your Apartment
by Sandi

Over use of swat teams.

A Milwaukee, WI Police swat team busted into Denise Berndsen's apartment, threw most of the occupants to the floor and cuffed them. Then tore the place apart saying that they would state their purpose in due time. They were looking for evidence of child porn.

Oops. The man they were targeting had moved out five weeks earlier.

Instead they roughed up Berndsen, who had returned home from back surgery that day, her 74-year-old father, and a man she had just started dating and who for a few terrifying minutes wondered what he got himself into.

Even if the guy hadn't move, is it necessary to come in full force with a swat team? Don't get me wrong, I think that child porn consumers are vile sick people, but they are seldom heavily armed, and there is no indication in the article that they suspected that he was.

"They proceeded to destroy my apartment, still not saying why they were there," she said. "They not only told me the detective would explain all in time, they also had the nerve to tell me I should be lucky I'm not in handcuffs."

Officers rummaged through her bedroom closet, dresser drawers and kitchen cabinets, and in doing so, broke a couple of wizard figurines and cracked the headboard mirror on Berndsen's bed, she said.

They brought high-tech equipment into the apartment and hooked it up to her laptop computer to search for evidence. If they were looking for porn, Berndsen said, she found it odd that they never touched a bookcase full of DVDs and videocassette tapes in the living room.

Once they realized their mistake, the police showed Berndsen and her guests a photo and told them the name of the man they were seeking. She said she recognized the name from some mail that had arrived at her place.

....

"They said, 'We're sorry. I guess you're just one more of his victims,' " meaning the child porn suspect, Berndsen said. "I said, no, we're your victims."

You like to think the cops are chasing after people who exploit children. But it would seem that with all their intelligence-gathering skills, they would know if the target had moved away more than a month earlier.

Sorry my ass. Nothing like passing the blame for their screwup to their victims. If they hadn't seen the suspect for more than a month, wouldn't you think that they would have at least checked with the apartment landlord?

Also via The World According to Nick.

Posted Wednesday November 28, 2007 | Catagory: (Stupid Should Hurt) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks