Skinning: Wordpress • Invision • Expression Engine • phpBB3
Would You Like to be Led Around on a Leash?
by Sandi
 
Tasha Maltby doesn't mind, nor does she mind the weird stares.





"I am a pet, I generally act animal like and I lead a really easy life," she said.

"I don't cook or clean and I don't go anywhere without Dani. It might seem strange but it makes us both happy. It's my culture and my choice. It isn't hurting anyone."

Hmmm no cooking or cleaning? Nah! still too humiliating, not to mention the hassles.


Last month, with Miss Maltby on a leash as usual, the couple tried to board a bus at the bus station.

The driver, who was off duty, was standing near the door.

Mr Graves alleged: "He shoved me off the bus. He called us freaks and he called Tasha a dog.

"He said, 'We don't let freaks and dogs like you on'. ....

In a separate incident, police were called when the driver, who has not been named, refused to allow other passengers on board after the couple ignored his orders and sat down.

But according to a Reuters report, the bus firm Arriva has apologized.

Arriva would not comment on specifics but said it apologised if the couple felt they had been discriminated against. It added, however, that the driver was worried about safety and the company told Maltby to take the leash off in the future.

"We have spoken to the driver who has talked about health and safety," a spokesman said. "Should she be attached to a chain and something happens on the bus, that could be dangerous. All we are saying is that she is very welcome to use the buses but not when she is on her lead."

Well I guess different strokes and all of that...

H/T to Wicked Thoughts blog

Posted Thursday January 24, 2008 | Catagory: (Stupid Should Hurt) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
'Crack Tax' Protects Druggies
by Sandi
Post Source: New York Post

I just don't know what to say about this other that I'm shocked. Look I don't care what drugs adults do, but if your going to tax it, for gods sake make it legal first.

Spitzer, in his 2008-09 budget proposal unveiled Tuesday, said he wants to create a tax stamp for illegal drugs, similar to such stamps used for cigarettes, which he says would raise $13 million in the coming fiscal year and $17 million annually after that.

According to a memo explaining the eyebrow-raising proposal, "The bill contains a unique and strict secrecy requirement, preserving the confidentiality of any information obtained from a dealer."

Disclosure of the information in some cases would be allowed for a criminal or civil proceeding involving taxes.

But "the bill specifically provides that none of the information may be used against the dealer in any criminal proceeding [other than a tax crime] unless it has been obtained independently," the memo said.

Dubbing it the "crack tax," state Sen. Martin Golden, a Brooklyn Republican and former city cop, called Spitzer's plan "another pie-in-the-sky idea that really has no legitimacy, and hopefully is not a first step toward legalizing drugs."

The plan, modeled after one in North Carolina, would require arrested drug dealers or users to purchase different tax stamps from the state.

Tennessee enacted a similar provision that brought in nearly $2 million dollars. The tax is supposed to go towards fighting drugs, but the article fails to mention the success in that area.

What next? I have it, a bomb tax with a strict secrecy requirement, preserving the confidentiality of any information obtained from a terrorist.

Posted Thursday January 24, 2008 | Catagory: (Stupid Should Hurt) | Permalink
0 Comments | 0 Trackbacks
Go Outside and Swear
by Sandi
 
So say the ST. CHARLES, Mo City officials.

ST. CHARLES, Mo. - What the ...? A St. Louis-area town is considering a bill that would ban swearing in bars, along with table-dancing, drinking contests and profane music.

City officials contend the bill is needed to keep rowdy crowds under control because the historic downtown area gets a little too lively on some nights.

City Councilman Richard Veit said he was prompted to propose the bill after complaints about bad bar behavior. He says it will give police some rules to enforce when things get too rowdy.

If crowds get too lively and needing control, why not just arrest, and charge them with sane ordiances, like disturbing the peace or disorderly conduct?

WTF!? Excuse my skepticism, but I think most police officers hearing someone swear in a bar will think of this ordinance (assuming it would pass), chuckle and move on.

On a related note, this article reminded me of a video clip I saw recently.


Swear Jar


Posted Friday January 18, 2008 | Catagory: (Stupid Should Hurt) | Permalink
1 Comments | 0 Trackbacks